|
Post by Spencer on Dec 5, 2010 0:04:12 GMT -5
Starting Shooting Guards must be....
6-10 or smaller. 235 or smaller. Case by case we will look at it.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jun 26, 2011 16:20:26 GMT -5
Edited.
|
|
|
Post by aar on Jun 26, 2011 18:28:37 GMT -5
The one thing that I hate about the PG and SG rule is that it makes it harder to move guys for TC and crams depth
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jun 26, 2011 18:35:04 GMT -5
Ya. I guess I could allow a grace period before and after TC.
|
|
Chipper
Junior Member
Ex-GM
Posts: 1,681
|
Post by Chipper on Jun 26, 2011 18:37:30 GMT -5
Ya. I guess I could allow a grace period before and after TC. I approve.
|
|
|
Post by Play on Jun 26, 2011 19:52:37 GMT -5
I like the grace period idea
|
|
|
Post by repole ಠ_ಠ on Jun 26, 2011 21:42:39 GMT -5
As do I...
|
|
|
Post by CC on Jun 26, 2011 21:52:27 GMT -5
should be renamed, "The CC Shooting Guard Rule"
|
|
|
Post by aar on Jun 26, 2011 22:53:37 GMT -5
Ya. I guess I could allow a grace period before and after TC. Same for the PG Rule? ![:)](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/smiley/smiley.png)
|
|
|
Post by Martinez on Jun 28, 2011 16:47:49 GMT -5
So many sex ofdendera
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Jun 28, 2011 16:52:55 GMT -5
already found a pretty serious flaw....PG's cant play SG without losing their right to play PG
|
|
|
Post by repole ಠ_ಠ on Jun 28, 2011 16:54:40 GMT -5
Eh yeah, that's pretty brutal. That pretty much totally destroys any concept of a combo guard or a versatile back court player.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jun 28, 2011 16:55:51 GMT -5
Easy fix.
|
|
|
Post by CC on Jun 28, 2011 16:55:56 GMT -5
looks like we need another new rule!
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jun 28, 2011 16:56:26 GMT -5
Basically I dont want B- + rebounding guys at SG. Its unrealistic. Lots of teams have fucked this one up already.
|
|