|
Post by GAME on Dec 31, 2011 14:07:13 GMT -5
Basically I dont want B- + rebounding guys at SG. Its unrealistic. Lots of teams have fucked this one up already.
|
|
|
Post by Martinez on Dec 31, 2011 14:10:31 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Martinez on Dec 31, 2011 14:11:23 GMT -5
oh that's right everyone wants to be a fucking troll and then try to blame it all on me for always trolling GTFO and mind your own fucking buisness
|
|
|
Post by GAME on Dec 31, 2011 14:23:02 GMT -5
I'm just dropping dimes like DROSE Was dropping them on my Clipps last nite
|
|
|
Post by Martinez on Dec 31, 2011 14:23:54 GMT -5
as long as you know what the hell you're saying, i guess we're ok
|
|
|
Post by repole ಠ_ಠ on Dec 31, 2011 15:22:50 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by repole ಠ_ಠ on Dec 31, 2011 15:23:14 GMT -5
GTFO and mind your own fucking buisness Ironic.
|
|
|
Post by Martinez on Dec 31, 2011 16:05:59 GMT -5
GTFO and mind your own fucking buisness Ironic. listen you pompous jackass, the rules clearly state 6-10 and under and 235 and under. Hence why calling out David Lee because he has B+ rebounding and not saying anything about Green who has A rebounding is ridiculous. Yes, I brought up your situation because *gasp* people are singling me out for no reason *gasp* So if you want to think highly of yourself and think I went out of my way to snitch you out go right ahead and think that you incompetent baboon. I was proving a point, notice how I didn't go in your thread calling you out I was bringing up the mere fact again.. people single me out for no reason. So yeah, let me not even bother responding to anyone anymore before you mistake it for trolling even though you quite clearly do a wonderful job of that fucking idiot.
|
|
|
Post by Juju Erving on Dec 31, 2011 16:15:45 GMT -5
have to side with Marty on this
|
|
|
Post by greeme on Dec 31, 2011 16:26:17 GMT -5
have to side with Marty on this
|
|
|
Post by repole ಠ_ಠ on Dec 31, 2011 16:43:57 GMT -5
except Lee was drafted/created as a PF. He was clearly not meant to be a SG.
Johnny Green, Bill Smith, Temple Tucker (who played an entire season at SG btw, so if that's ok I'm not sure why Green wouldn't be) were all drafted as SFs, none of which were meant to be big men. Before I dealt for Green I explicitly went back and checked his draft notes to see if there was anything about him playing SG, and when asked Spencer responded with "Hes gonna guard poorly wherever you put him. So Id probably leave him at SF." As you can see, there's no explicit "he can't play SG," so I fail to see why that would have changed.
The spirit of this rule, to me, always seemed to be that guys who were meant to be big men shouldn't be playing SG. Lee was meant to be a big man, Green/Smith/Tucker weren't.
|
|
|
Post by GAME on Dec 31, 2011 16:52:48 GMT -5
except Lee was drafted/created as a PF. He was clearly not meant to be a SG. Johnny Green, Bill Smith, Temple Tucker (who played an entire season at SG btw, so if that's ok I'm not sure why Green wouldn't be) were all drafted as SFs, none of which were meant to be big men. Before I dealt for Green I explicitly went back and checked his draft notes to see if there was anything about him playing SG, and when asked Spencer responded with "Hes gonna guard poorly wherever you put him. So Id probably leave him at SF." As you can see, there's no explicit "he can't play SG," so I fail to see why that would have changed. The spirit of this rule, to me, always seemed to be that guys who were meant to be big men shouldn't be playing SG. Lee was meant to be a big man, Green/Smith/Tucker weren't. This is the only reason I made any comment And....I was bored,also boards were dead Yeeee me
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Dec 31, 2011 16:54:39 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Martinez on Dec 31, 2011 17:04:14 GMT -5
how is that being owned? Ive played plenty of guys with B or higher rebounding at the 2 and I'll admit to that I don't see why David Lee playing there or anyone who's clearly under the limit is.
|
|
|
Post by Martinez on Dec 31, 2011 17:04:47 GMT -5
except Lee was drafted/created as a PF. He was clearly not meant to be a SG. Johnny Green, Bill Smith, Temple Tucker (who played an entire season at SG btw, so if that's ok I'm not sure why Green wouldn't be) were all drafted as SFs, none of which were meant to be big men. Before I dealt for Green I explicitly went back and checked his draft notes to see if there was anything about him playing SG, and when asked Spencer responded with "Hes gonna guard poorly wherever you put him. So Id probably leave him at SF." As you can see, there's no explicit "he can't play SG," so I fail to see why that would have changed. The spirit of this rule, to me, always seemed to be that guys who were meant to be big men shouldn't be playing SG. Lee was meant to be a big man, Green/Smith/Tucker weren't. This is the only reason I made any comment And....I was bored,also boards were dead Yeeee me no it isn't or else you would have said that from the start we all know you aren't capable of an intelligible post
|
|