|
|
Post by styro on Aug 31, 2010 13:08:03 GMT -5
lol broph, you called me cavs
|
|
|
|
Post by CC on Aug 31, 2010 13:09:12 GMT -5
lol im not projected #4 anymore
|
|
|
|
Post by styro on Aug 31, 2010 13:10:41 GMT -5
you're like 7th now lol
|
|
|
|
Post by gp on Aug 31, 2010 13:17:53 GMT -5
1 more!
|
|
|
|
Post by gp on Aug 31, 2010 13:50:33 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Aug 31, 2010 14:02:40 GMT -5
lol broph, you called me cavs I woulda proofread it before I posted...but I didnt care |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Aug 31, 2010 18:06:02 GMT -5
Just looking at the mock, not judging....
Roy and Paul would be nasty. What a great 1-2 punch. Just get a shooting SF and some defenders/rebounders/shot blockers and the Nets are sick.
Adding Noah to Granger and Williams is kinda unreal. Looks like they could have a really great balanced team. Might need a true #1 scorer but even just a journeyman type that can score would be ok.
Rondo wouldnt be a bad pick in this scenario and it would allow for Williams to be the #1 scorer and SG. Obviously a trade makes more sense, but lots of talent.
Aldridge and Amare would be pretty nasty. Pretty talented front line.
Gay to Play makes a ton of sense for multiple reasons, lol.
Maniac will make the Philly selection. Bargs is a pretty solid first piece though. Just make him a super scorer and not worry about his D.
Blazers already have a good team so just take the BPA. Thomas is pretty athletic and should add some great depth to the Blazas!
|
|
|
|
Post by styro on Aug 31, 2010 18:32:50 GMT -5
Gay to Play makes a ton of sense for multiple reasons, lol.
lol
|
|
|
|
Post by Ab-Soul on Aug 31, 2010 20:28:24 GMT -5
Gay to Play makes a ton of sense for multiple reasons, lol. lol haha |
|
manasrai
Senior Member
Ex-GM
Posts: 8,332
|
Post by manasrai on Aug 31, 2010 20:32:35 GMT -5
lol
|
|
