|
|
Post by Spencer on Jun 12, 2012 14:58:45 GMT -5
Would you guys want to run a live draft? I wouldnt. At all. But if I got a couple volunteers to do it each time it may fix this.
|
|
|
|
Post by styro on Jun 12, 2012 14:59:28 GMT -5
what's wrong w/ the draft as is? Is one day too long?
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jun 12, 2012 15:01:16 GMT -5
I dont have any problems with the draft as is.
Live drafts would seem to be more fun, and more orderly. Lists or attend. Trading, posting, etc.
|
|
|
|
Post by styro on Jun 12, 2012 15:02:31 GMT -5
mehhh. all that gets accomplished as is though.
|
|
|
|
Post by repole ಠ_ಠ on Jun 12, 2012 15:02:33 GMT -5
Voting against this is essentially saying "Hey everyone, I'm too lazy to make a five person list sometimes and feel like slowing down the whole process because of it. Sorry, but not really." ummm. no not at all. I just don't want my list used asap or my pick made asap which is what you guys do. I deserve my time to see what i want to do. So you're saying you want your 2 hours despite being on the boards? WTF? If instructions are given not to use the list if you're on the boards, then we do that. That's not a huge deal, we just have to be told to do so. The point is generally no one signs on 15 minutes into their time and starts trading. If you intend to trade, you should have to be on the boards when it's actually your pick, I don't see how that's an issue. |
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Jun 12, 2012 15:02:44 GMT -5
i used to love live drafts
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jun 12, 2012 15:04:24 GMT -5
i used to love live drafts I think its a draw tbh. It needs to be run well, but it can be fun. |
|
|
|
Post by styro on Jun 12, 2012 15:05:43 GMT -5
ummm. no not at all. I just don't want my list used asap or my pick made asap which is what you guys do. I deserve my time to see what i want to do. So you're saying you want your 2 hours despite being on the boards? WTF? If instructions are given not to use the list if you're on the boards, then we do that. That's not a huge deal, we just have to be told to do so. The point is generally no one signs on 15 minutes into their time and starts trading. If you intend to trade, you should have to be on the boards when it's actually your pick, I don't see how that's an issue. scenario: I log off within 5 picks of my slot. Instead of having my pick cpu'd or list used within 30 mins. from the time my turn is up (as i understand this rule to be). I think i deserve my 2 hour time frame to check back in to the site. Not the 30 mins. cpu/list thing you are proposing. |
|
|
|
Post by Play on Jun 12, 2012 15:05:48 GMT -5
If you intend on trading your pick....You should be shopping it before the lotto even starts.
|
|
|
|
Post by repole ಠ_ಠ on Jun 12, 2012 15:06:16 GMT -5
i used to love live drafts I think its a draw tbh. It needs to be run well, but it can be fun. I tend to prefer things this style. More time to get things done. I often came away from live drafts feeling rushed. But they were fun. |
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Jun 12, 2012 15:06:20 GMT -5
If you intend on trading your pick....You should be shopping it before the lotto even starts. |
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Jun 12, 2012 15:06:50 GMT -5
nothing worse than gm's who wait till it's their turn to pick and decide to shop it then. especially in the lotto, it's easy to know generally who will be around
|
|
|
|
Post by styro on Jun 12, 2012 15:06:55 GMT -5
lol, nah. You see what players are dropping and then react to what's available at your slot. You don't make predetermined trades.
|
|
|
|
Post by styro on Jun 12, 2012 15:07:27 GMT -5
lol. gm's don't start showing interest until they know what's gonna be there.
|
|
|
|
Post by styro on Jun 12, 2012 15:07:47 GMT -5
sometimes. Nothing more annoying than trying trim down a 24 hour draft lol.
|
|
