|
Post by Martinez on Jul 15, 2011 10:43:24 GMT -5
name 5 Bigs averaging what Juno averages as a 3rd option. That is pretty just a few points better than what Bunn did as a 3rd/4th option last year and bunn shot higher %s and blocks shots hey you simpleton, 43%FG is not higher %s retard. 2025 Nuggets 82 33.8 593 1357 .437 430 513 .838 21 63 .333 8.6 3.1 0.5 3.0 2.7 7 20.0 504 Juno Tremont PF 16 41.1 25.1 11.9 3.7 1.4 1.1 2.1 .446 .713 .300
|
|
|
Post by Haberino on Jul 15, 2011 10:43:53 GMT -5
why are you boasting 45% and 70% ft from a guy like it's good? there are probably like 45 bigs who could give you 20 points on those percentages if they got the touches. at sf that kind of midrange is awful; at pf the fg% and blocks are a big setback. rooks is pretty much without flaws, and only a year older. the only argument in juno's favor is that bigs are more valuable.
|
|
|
Post by greeme on Jul 15, 2011 10:43:58 GMT -5
That is pretty just a few point better than what Bunn did as a 3rd/4th option last year and bunn shot higher %s and blocks shots 2025 Nuggets 82 33.8 593 1357 .437 430 513 .838 21 63 .333 8.6 3.1 0.5 3.0 2.7 7 20.0 20/8/0/3/43% FG is not even remotely close idiot. factor in fts, moron
|
|
|
Post by Martinez on Jul 15, 2011 10:44:51 GMT -5
why are you boasting 45% and 70% ft from a guy like it's good? there are probably like 45 bigs who could give you 20 points on those percentages if they got the touches. at sf that kind of midrange is awful; at pf the fg% and blocks are a big setback. rooks is pretty much without flaws, and only a year older. the only argument in juno's favor is that bigs are more valuable. yeah sorry but I think I value Broph and Spencer's opinion more than yours and if they say Juno has much more value than Rooks I believe them
|
|
|
Post by greeme on Jul 15, 2011 10:46:14 GMT -5
why are you boasting 45% and 70% ft from a guy like it's good? there are probably like 45 bigs who could give you 20 points on those percentages if they got the touches. at sf that kind of midrange is awful; at pf the fg% and blocks are a big setback. rooks is pretty much without flaws, and only a year older. the only argument in juno's favor is that bigs are more valuable. yeah sorry but I think I value Broph and Spencer's opinion more than yours and if they say Juno has much more value than Rooks I believe them take into account that they might just be playing with you didn't Spencer try to get you to draft Valentine instead of Hollis?
|
|
|
Post by Martinez on Jul 15, 2011 10:46:45 GMT -5
yeah sorry but I think I value Broph and Spencer's opinion more than yours and if they say Juno has much more value than Rooks I believe them take into account that they might just be playing with you didn't Spencer try to get you to draft Valentine instead of Hollis? I drafted both you moron.
|
|
|
Post by greeme on Jul 15, 2011 10:48:17 GMT -5
That is pretty just a few points better than what Bunn did as a 3rd/4th option last year and bunn shot higher %s and blocks shots hey you simpleton, 43%FG is not higher %s retard. 2025 Nuggets 82 33.8 593 1357 .437 430 513 .838 21 63 .333 8.6 3.1 0.5 3.0 2.7 7 20.0 504 Juno Tremont PF 16 41.1 25.1 11.9 3.7 1.4 1.1 2.1 .446 .713 .300 since juno is playing over 41 minutes and Bunn played under 34 maybe you should check their stats over 36 min and see how they match up
|
|
|
Post by greeme on Jul 15, 2011 10:49:07 GMT -5
take into account that they might just be playing with you didn't Spencer try to get you to draft Valentine instead of Hollis? I drafted both you moron. Or was it Xi? I just always remember him posting that Hollis might not go number 1
|
|
|
Post by Martinez on Jul 15, 2011 10:50:00 GMT -5
I drafted both you moron. Or was it Xi? I just always remember him posting that Hollis might not go number 1 Yes those are what we call Draft Notes.
|
|
|
Post by Martinez on Jul 15, 2011 10:51:22 GMT -5
hey you simpleton, 43%FG is not higher %s retard. 2025 Nuggets 82 33.8 593 1357 .437 430 513 .838 21 63 .333 8.6 3.1 0.5 3.0 2.7 7 20.0 504 Juno Tremont PF 16 41.1 25.1 11.9 3.7 1.4 1.1 2.1 .446 .713 .300 since juno is playing over 41 minutes and Bunn played under 34 maybe you should check their stats over 36 min and see how they match up Yes, even more reason why your comparison is retarded. Bunn was getting 17 shots per game in less minutes. Juno is currently getting 20 shots per game with more minutes, and Bunn shot worse FG% numbers.
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Jul 15, 2011 10:51:45 GMT -5
Trade me Juno dammit Marty
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Jul 15, 2011 10:52:14 GMT -5
Ac inside and Jump shot and the dudes a top 3 PF
|
|
|
Post by greeme on Jul 15, 2011 10:53:40 GMT -5
Trade me Juno dammit Marty who would you give for Juno?
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Jul 15, 2011 10:56:24 GMT -5
lol none of my youth since Im fucking gonna tank again....
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Jul 15, 2011 10:57:08 GMT -5
yes I am too attached to my players, oh well
|
|