|
Post by Martinez on Jul 15, 2011 10:32:17 GMT -5
so you should be happy. fyi - Spencer hasn't even won a game in this league in years you are incredibly observant except the whole part when he ran the Suns in the playoffs last year and took the what 6th or 7th seeded Suns to the West Conf Finals? lol'd though
|
|
|
Post by greeme on Jul 15, 2011 10:33:19 GMT -5
anyone who doesn't think greeme could use Juno more than Rooks is an idiot maybe but that isn't always a good enough reason to make a trade i think you could use Rivers more than Juno bc the upgrade from JJ to Rivers > the downgrade at pf
|
|
|
Post by greeme on Jul 15, 2011 10:33:45 GMT -5
but that still wouldn't be a good enough reason for you to do that trade
|
|
|
Post by Martinez on Jul 15, 2011 10:34:24 GMT -5
anyone who doesn't think greeme could use Juno more than Rooks is an idiot maybe but that isn't always a good enough reason to make a trade i think you could use Rivers more than Juno bc the upgrade from JJ to Rivers > the downgrade at pf Yes, let me trade a big who's constantly improved in TCs for a 33 year old PG on a 23million dollar contract.
|
|
|
Post by Haberino on Jul 15, 2011 10:35:57 GMT -5
but let's be real... Haberman has been desperately trying to trade me 33 year old McCallum for Juno so that's why this is a bad deal in his opinion marty that offers off the table like i told you it would be if you didn't get back to me. it's irrelevant. rooks' value kills mccallum, but i'd like to see you argue in favor of juno. all he has going for him is that he sat on LA with great ratings so once he's available, his value gets inflated. in reality, he's a tweener with bad percentages and turnovers. i only wanted him to flip him for another piece. can't youre talking about a 24/5.5/11 pg with great percentages and low turnovers vs. a big shooting 44% and 70 from the line. great, he'll put up 25 if you give him the touches, but that's a huge strain on your offense.
|
|
|
Post by greeme on Jul 15, 2011 10:36:23 GMT -5
maybe but that isn't always a good enough reason to make a trade i think you could use Rivers more than Juno bc the upgrade from JJ to Rivers > the downgrade at pf Yes, let me trade a big who's constantly improved in TCs for a 33 year old PG on a 23million dollar contract. OK i let you
|
|
|
Post by Martinez on Jul 15, 2011 10:37:42 GMT -5
but let's be real... Haberman has been desperately trying to trade me 33 year old McCallum for Juno so that's why this is a bad deal in his opinion marty that offers off the table like i told you it would be if you didn't get back to me. it's irrelevant. rooks' value kills mccallum, but i'd like to see you argue in favor of juno. all he has going for him is that he sat on LA with great ratings so once he's available, his value gets inflated. in reality, he's a tweener with bad percentages and turnovers. i only wanted him to flip him for another piece. can't youre talking about a 24/5.5/11 pg with great percentages and low turnovers vs. a big shooting 44% and 70 from the line. great, he'll put up 25 if you give him the touches, but that's a huge strain on your offense. name 5 Bigs averaging what Juno averages as a 3rd option.
|
|
|
Post by greeme on Jul 15, 2011 10:38:27 GMT -5
but let's be real... Haberman has been desperately trying to trade me 33 year old McCallum for Juno so that's why this is a bad deal in his opinion marty that offers off the table like i told you it would be if you didn't get back to me. it's irrelevant. rooks' value kills mccallum, but i'd like to see you argue in favor of juno. all he has going for him is that he sat on LA with great ratings so once he's available, his value gets inflated. in reality, he's a tweener with bad percentages and turnovers. i only wanted him to flip him for another piece. can't youre talking about a 24/5.5/11 pg with great percentages and low turnovers vs. a big shooting 44% and 70 from the line. great, he'll put up 25 if you give him the touches, but that's a huge strain on your offense. I think Juno had a lot more value bf this whole thread good job Marty
|
|
|
Post by Martinez on Jul 15, 2011 10:39:03 GMT -5
marty that offers off the table like i told you it would be if you didn't get back to me. it's irrelevant. rooks' value kills mccallum, but i'd like to see you argue in favor of juno. all he has going for him is that he sat on LA with great ratings so once he's available, his value gets inflated. in reality, he's a tweener with bad percentages and turnovers. i only wanted him to flip him for another piece. can't youre talking about a 24/5.5/11 pg with great percentages and low turnovers vs. a big shooting 44% and 70 from the line. great, he'll put up 25 if you give him the touches, but that's a huge strain on your offense. I think Juno had a lot more value bf this whole thread good job Marty I think you give yourself way to much credit if you think anyone pays much attention to your opinion
|
|
|
Post by Martinez on Jul 15, 2011 10:39:57 GMT -5
but let's be real... Haberman has been desperately trying to trade me 33 year old McCallum for Juno so that's why this is a bad deal in his opinion marty that offers off the table like i told you it would be if you didn't get back to me. it's irrelevant. rooks' value kills mccallum, but i'd like to see you argue in favor of juno. all he has going for him is that he sat on LA with great ratings so once he's available, his value gets inflated. in reality, he's a tweener with bad percentages and turnovers. i only wanted him to flip him for another piece. can't youre talking about a 24/5.5/11 pg with great percentages and low turnovers vs. a big shooting 44% and 70 from the line. great, he'll put up 25 if you give him the touches, but that's a huge strain on your offense. Also, I love how you are taking 16games worth of a sample to judge Tremont when he's a career 46%FG shooter. I would love to see how many bigs out there are even averaging 20/10/1/1/45% and 70% from the line.
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Jul 15, 2011 10:40:01 GMT -5
i think rooks is better than juno but i'd think that juno absolutely has more value
|
|
|
Post by Haberino on Jul 15, 2011 10:41:04 GMT -5
i'm sure he does, and i think if he'd been around the league instead of sitting in one place with great ratings, that would be dispelled. he's not actually very good.
|
|
|
Post by greeme on Jul 15, 2011 10:41:06 GMT -5
marty that offers off the table like i told you it would be if you didn't get back to me. it's irrelevant. rooks' value kills mccallum, but i'd like to see you argue in favor of juno. all he has going for him is that he sat on LA with great ratings so once he's available, his value gets inflated. in reality, he's a tweener with bad percentages and turnovers. i only wanted him to flip him for another piece. can't youre talking about a 24/5.5/11 pg with great percentages and low turnovers vs. a big shooting 44% and 70 from the line. great, he'll put up 25 if you give him the touches, but that's a huge strain on your offense. name 5 Bigs averaging what Juno averages as a 3rd option. That is pretty just a few points better than what Bunn did as a 3rd/4th option last year and bunn shot higher %s and blocks shots
|
|
|
Post by Martinez on Jul 15, 2011 10:42:53 GMT -5
name 5 Bigs averaging what Juno averages as a 3rd option. That is pretty just a few point better than what Bunn did as a 3rd/4th option last year and bunn shot higher %s and blocks shots 2025 Nuggets 82 33.8 593 1357 .437 430 513 .838 21 63 .333 8.6 3.1 0.5 3.0 2.7 7 20.0 20/8/0/3/43% FG is not even remotely close idiot.
|
|
|
Post by greeme on Jul 15, 2011 10:43:10 GMT -5
marty that offers off the table like i told you it would be if you didn't get back to me. it's irrelevant. rooks' value kills mccallum, but i'd like to see you argue in favor of juno. all he has going for him is that he sat on LA with great ratings so once he's available, his value gets inflated. in reality, he's a tweener with bad percentages and turnovers. i only wanted him to flip him for another piece. can't youre talking about a 24/5.5/11 pg with great percentages and low turnovers vs. a big shooting 44% and 70 from the line. great, he'll put up 25 if you give him the touches, but that's a huge strain on your offense. name 5 Bigs averaging what Juno averages as a 3rd option. you are missing the point, the point is that he demands a lot of shots and he is not an efficient shooter
|
|