|
Post by nova on Apr 29, 2010 13:18:38 GMT -5
Tony Parker 18 PG 6-2 180 France Rookie Ratings:[/u] B+ C C+ C+ D+ A Strengths:[/u] A very good athlete, Parker has tremendous ability to drive into the lane and get layups. He's very quick and is able to blow by and get around defenders. He has great finishing ability too. Parker's a solid defender too, and should develop into a quality defender. He's not a pure pass-first PG, but he should be a solid passer. Parker has great upside and should be a top 5 PG soon because of his scoring. Weaknesses:[/u] Doesn't have much of an outside shot at all. A very mediocre 3 point shooter and at best, a below-average 3 pt shooter. Parker is also an awful rebounder, though at PG, that's not a huge concern. Scouts main concern in regards to Parker is his inconsistency. They're not completely sold on him being a great passing PG. Overall though, his weaknesses aren't too worrisome. Overview:[/u] A probable top 5 pick who should have a very good career.
|
|
manasrai
Senior Member
Ex-GM
Posts: 8,332
|
Post by manasrai on Apr 29, 2010 13:23:57 GMT -5
looks great. Ratings kinda like KJ
|
|
|
Post by styro on Apr 29, 2010 13:25:13 GMT -5
stud
|
|
|
Post by gp on Apr 29, 2010 16:31:15 GMT -5
#1...this guy's gonna be a top 5 player in the league.
|
|
|
Post by dJ on Apr 29, 2010 16:46:25 GMT -5
looks like im tanking in 2000
|
|
Ducky
Full Member
Ex-GM
71% of the world is covered by water. The rest is covered by Cliff Harris.
Posts: 4,180
|
Post by Ducky on May 1, 2010 4:23:18 GMT -5
he's so good.. I hate when we play against him.
|
|
|
Post by dJ on May 11, 2010 0:35:08 GMT -5
Eva
|
|
|
Post by dJ on May 11, 2010 0:58:38 GMT -5
doubt he'll be as good as last time
|
|
|
Post by Jeff on May 11, 2010 10:16:57 GMT -5
C+ defense?
Honestly in his prime he should be A- C+ B+ B C- C? No better than that right?
|
|
|
Post by Jeff on May 11, 2010 10:19:51 GMT -5
Even those might be high.
He's only gone over 20ppg once in his career, never topped 7apg, never over 1.3spg, and never over 79%FT.
A- C+ B B C- C might be better.
|
|
|
Post by dJ on May 11, 2010 21:25:11 GMT -5
i think he's a better scorer than given credit for... A- B- type scorer would be realistic... but he def isnt a high asst guy...
|
|
|
Post by Jeff on May 11, 2010 22:58:42 GMT -5
i think he's a better scorer than given credit for... A- B- type scorer would be realistic... but he def isnt a high asst guy... He's gone over 20ppg one time in his career. Most of his career he's been a 16-17ppg guy. Not really that impressive.
|
|
|
Post by dJ on May 11, 2010 23:23:16 GMT -5
he shoots 50% from the floor... and has played on a team with a dominant inside presence. I think he could score more if he wanted to.. but that prob doesnt fit the spurs team concept. Actually, looking at his real life stats... C+ shooting is probably accurate. A- C+ scorer.... or maybe A C for fun.
|
|
|
Post by dJ on May 11, 2010 23:23:40 GMT -5
anyone remember Beep Lane? He was an A C scorer.. that would be perfect for Parker.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on May 12, 2010 0:30:43 GMT -5
So it seems like you've both come to the conclusion that his ratings are perfect? Well done.
|
|