|
|
Post by Spencer on Apr 26, 2010 14:20:04 GMT -5
649 Chris Webber PF 25 6'10'' 245 A- C C C A- B
649 Chris Webber PF 39 32.5 21.0 11.4 3.2 0.7 1.4 2.1 .449 .757 .067
649 Chris Webber PF 25 $12,000,000 $13,200,000 $14,400,000 $15,600,000 $16,800,000 $18,000,000 $0 $90,000,000
or
623 Brian Grant PF 25 6'9'' 254 B+ C- D+ B B+ C
623 Brian Grant PF 38 33.0 22.1 11.2 2.5 0.7 0.7 1.6 .432 .727 .000
623 Brian Grant PF 25 $12,000,000 $13,200,000 $14,400,000 $15,600,000 $16,800,000 $18,000,000 $0 $90,000,000
Im gonna do some of these to stir up interest. Itll also maybe help people with player values and trading. Never know.
This one seems pretty close to me.
Thoughts?
|
|
|
|
Post by nova on Apr 26, 2010 14:21:26 GMT -5
CWebb. I don't think his numbers are inflated. I do think grant's are.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Apr 26, 2010 14:25:02 GMT -5
Both are first options. Webber hasnt been all year, but he is currently. %'s are similar.
|
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Apr 26, 2010 14:26:06 GMT -5
CWebb. I don't think his numbers are inflated. I do think grant's are. |
|
|
|
Post by gp on Apr 26, 2010 14:50:22 GMT -5
Webber. If Grant disrupted more on defense with blocks or steals, he'd get my vote cause I still think Webber should be better than his ratings indicate.
|
|
|
|
Post by Stannis Baratheon on Apr 26, 2010 14:51:22 GMT -5
Grant
|
|
Matthew
Full Member
Ex-GM
Posts: 4,558
|
Post by Matthew on Apr 26, 2010 15:06:49 GMT -5
Grant
|
|
|
|
Post by Andrew on Apr 26, 2010 15:33:16 GMT -5
Chris Webber because of his handling rating!
|
|
|
|
Post by Haberino on Apr 26, 2010 15:49:50 GMT -5
His turnovers suck so what good is his handling? Grant. One guy has C defense and almost no edge in production. No thanks.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Apr 26, 2010 15:51:03 GMT -5
These 2 are pretty close IMO. I think if I needed to pick, Id pick Webber just because Im scared Grant is a season or 2 away from being B B B. While Webber even if he declines he could be B+ C B+ or B+ C B and still be a solid scorer rebounder.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Apr 26, 2010 15:51:44 GMT -5
Webber has C defense but at least he blocks some shots.
|
|
|
|
Post by Andrew on Apr 26, 2010 15:58:33 GMT -5
Id rather have Ivan Chiriaev
|
|
|
|
Post by Mark on Apr 26, 2010 16:01:20 GMT -5
I'd definitely rather have Grant
|
|
|
|
Post by Blue on Apr 27, 2010 1:41:39 GMT -5
Really dislike both for what they're being paid but I'd probably lean towards Webber. He has more of a history of putting up 20/10-ish numbers while Grant doesn't have that track record. Grant got out to a really hot start but has cooled off considerably.
|
|
Matthew
Full Member
Ex-GM
Posts: 4,558
|
Post by Matthew on Apr 27, 2010 1:55:31 GMT -5
I wouldnt even want Webber on my team other than a sub. No way I want a big with C defense starting for me. Grant is solid. He is a mini Oakley.
|
|
