|
|
Post by ashes on Dec 3, 2009 20:49:57 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Dec 3, 2009 20:51:28 GMT -5
I'm going to change Dick Cheese's name to Sneakers O'Toole.
|
|
|
|
Post by CC on Dec 3, 2009 20:51:54 GMT -5
willie anderson is a good passer. maybe he can play point for us.
|
|
|
|
Post by CC on Dec 3, 2009 20:53:41 GMT -5
rice is a turnover whore.
|
|
|
|
Post by CC on Dec 3, 2009 20:53:57 GMT -5
tarpley is awesome.
|
|
|
|
Post by CC on Dec 3, 2009 20:54:14 GMT -5
strickland is playing beyond his ratings.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jeff on Dec 3, 2009 21:05:08 GMT -5
Look, all I was saying is he can be listed at SG with A- defense and play the PG position, he will still play A quality defense. I was just saying, you responded to my point with the incorrect question, because the answer would be no. If you wanted to randomly just point out that he plays defense better a PG, you could have just said that. You're obviously right. My point was correct, his ability to play defense at PG is better than at SG. Hence is ability would improve. Thanks for trying though. |
|
|
|
Post by Jeff on Dec 3, 2009 21:06:05 GMT -5
I'm going to change Dick Cheese's name to Sneakers O'Toole. Why because you think you're the only person who knows how FBB works? Sorry that I challenged your status as FBB know-it-all. |
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Dec 3, 2009 21:18:31 GMT -5
k bro
|
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Dec 3, 2009 21:23:19 GMT -5
You still missed my entire point, but it's whatever. Skillz was moving him so he looked better, but still plays him at SG, where he will still sim like he's an A- defender, even though it will say A. That was my point. That's what I said. You wanted to randomly mention that he's defends PGs better. Yes, he does. Ok.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jeff on Dec 3, 2009 21:23:50 GMT -5
I'm just unsure why this got your panties all in a bunch. It's not like this was some important issue.
|
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Dec 3, 2009 21:28:13 GMT -5
I'm just unsure why this got your panties all in a bunch. It's not like this was some important issue. Because you asked me a question in response to the point I was making. It sounded like you were either legitimately asking me a question or trying to refute what I was saying, so I went with the first, because you made it sound like just because Skillz moves him to PG he'll defend PGs better, which isn't the case. It's where he plays him, and if you already knew that, then I have no idea why you asked the question, because it certainly didn't apply to me. |
|
|
|
Post by Jeff on Dec 3, 2009 21:28:32 GMT -5
You still missed my entire point, but it's whatever. Skillz was moving him so he looked better, but still plays him at SG, where he will still sim like he's an A- defender, even though it will say A. That was my point. That's what I said. You wanted to randomly mention that he's defends PGs better. Yes, he does. Ok. All I said was that his ability to defend at PG is better than to defend at SG. You wanted to go on some tangent about whatever the hell you were bitching about. I'm pretty sure just about everyone knows FBB well enough to realize that his ratings don't actually change because his letter grade changed. So I guess both of our points are irrelevant? |
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Dec 3, 2009 21:31:08 GMT -5
It's not a big deal, I just honestly had no idea what the point of you saying that was in the first place.
|
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Dec 3, 2009 21:32:58 GMT -5
You still missed my entire point, but it's whatever. Skillz was moving him so he looked better, but still plays him at SG, where he will still sim like he's an A- defender, even though it will say A. That was my point. That's what I said. You wanted to randomly mention that he's defends PGs better. Yes, he does. Ok. All I said was that his ability to defend at PG is better than to defend at SG. You wanted to go on some tangent about whatever the hell you were bitching about. I'm pretty sure just about everyone knows FBB well enough to realize that his ratings don't actually change because his letter grade changed. So I guess both of our points are irrelevant? In the context, it just didn't make sense for you to say that he defends PGs better, especially in the form of a backwards question. That's why it just seemed like something else. I wasn't bitching about anything. |
|
