|
|
Post by jaycatch on May 24, 2012 13:08:19 GMT -5
I don't see the flaw in my idea, but I don't care enough about the concept of roundtables. We're getting spammed with interview articles though.
|
|
|
|
Post by greeme on May 24, 2012 13:12:09 GMT -5
I don't see the flaw in my idea, but I don't care enough about the concept of roundtables. We're getting spammed with interview articles though. You don't see the flaw in your team either so.... |
|
|
|
Post by jaycatch on May 24, 2012 13:18:00 GMT -5
I don't see the flaw in my idea, but I don't care enough about the concept of roundtables. We're getting spammed with interview articles though. You don't see the flaw in your team either so.... |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on May 24, 2012 14:42:19 GMT -5
But then Im sure a ton of guys would do this. Free +3 RCs arent huge though. Or maybe allow 2 more +3 RCs through Roundtables? POster gets the article amount as an AC. 4 GMs involved get a RC that can be a players 4th or 5th RC. Wouldn't a poster want the RC instead though? Id rather have a +5 AC then an RC even if it is the 4th RC. |
|
|
|
Post by BRB on May 24, 2012 15:42:45 GMT -5
Wouldn't a poster want the RC instead though? Id rather have a +5 AC then an RC even if it is the 4th RC. What if your a poster that writes a lot of articles though? In my situation, I'd rather give Scott a 4th RC then add another AC when I know I'm going to write enough articles in the near future to give out to whoever's left of value anyways. |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on May 24, 2012 16:47:53 GMT -5
Id rather have a +5 AC then an RC even if it is the 4th RC. What if your a poster that writes a lot of articles though? In my situation, I'd rather give Scott a 4th RC then add another AC when I know I'm going to write enough articles in the near future to give out to whoever's left of value anyways. Then you could sacrifice a +5 +4 or +3 AC as an RC in a roundtable scenario? |
|
|
|
Post by BRB on May 24, 2012 17:10:43 GMT -5
That's cool
|
|
