|
|
Post by Spencer on May 23, 2012 11:42:33 GMT -5
IDK what to do with this tbh. Nothing makes sense to me.
|
|
|
|
Post by styro on May 23, 2012 12:02:52 GMT -5
My Proposal:Grade roundtables on a scale of 1-3 instead of 1-5. So it's like an extra RC, except it uses up one of your ACs. So a guy will only be able to be +21 instead of +24. Seems like the most logical trade off. Only a select few really do articles, this would give some others a chance to get some AC points. I like this. that would probably eliminate roundtables a little more. No one wants to decrease the max amount their players can receive. |
|
|
|
Post by jaycatch on May 23, 2012 12:33:49 GMT -5
that would probably eliminate roundtables a little more. No one wants to decrease the max amount their players can receive. There are a ton of players out there without ACs that will never get them because their GMs aren't the article type. There are a ton of fringe players that won't get them normally that could benefit from this. If you don't want to lose that extra 2 points (to correct what I said earlier, it'd be +22 instead of +24) then write an article to help that player. It seems simple enough. I firmly believe this is better than the alternative. |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on May 23, 2012 17:10:03 GMT -5
We could make the RCs freebies. Keep the 85s rule obviously.
|
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on May 23, 2012 17:11:02 GMT -5
ehh, gotta limit them if you do that, a freebie RC is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>than an AC
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on May 23, 2012 17:11:08 GMT -5
But then Im sure a ton of guys would do this. Free +3 RCs arent huge though.
Or maybe allow 2 more +3 RCs through Roundtables?
POster gets the article amount as an AC.
4 GMs involved get a RC that can be a players 4th or 5th RC.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on May 23, 2012 17:11:24 GMT -5
But then Im sure a ton of guys would do this. Free +3 RCs arent huge though. Or maybe allow 2 more +3 RCs through Roundtables? POster gets the article amount as an AC. 4 GMs involved get a RC that can be a players 4th or 5th RC. |
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on May 23, 2012 17:11:34 GMT -5
2 Round tables gets you the average poll result
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on May 23, 2012 17:12:14 GMT -5
2 Round tables gets you the average poll result For everyone? IDK. |
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on May 23, 2012 17:12:27 GMT -5
average poll result rounded up*
|
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on May 23, 2012 17:12:55 GMT -5
2 Round tables gets you the average poll result For everyone? IDK. yeah, they just have to link to both, CC checks it, not hard, or you trust your GM's to not lie about having two |
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on May 23, 2012 17:13:19 GMT -5
obviously the Roundtable writer still gets his AC
|
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on May 23, 2012 17:13:33 GMT -5
for the responders I guess, misunderstood what you were saying
|
|
|
|
Post by Juju Erving on May 23, 2012 17:40:17 GMT -5
don't care about this anymore now that I see it through styro's eyes. all of these interview articles = roundtable cut up
fuck it
|
|
|
|
Post by BRB on May 23, 2012 20:50:44 GMT -5
But then Im sure a ton of guys would do this. Free +3 RCs arent huge though. Or maybe allow 2 more +3 RCs through Roundtables? POster gets the article amount as an AC. 4 GMs involved get a RC that can be a players 4th or 5th RC. Wouldn't a poster want the RC instead though? |
|
