|
|
Post by Spencer on Feb 19, 2012 18:45:31 GMT -5
Jim Cleamons PG 6'3'' 185 22 B C B- B+ C B
Isaiah Wilson PG 6'2'' 175 23 C B- A B- D- C
Charlie Yelverton PG 6'2'' 190 22 C C+ C+ C C C
John Roche PG 6'3'' 170 22 C B B C+ D B
Dave Wohl PG 6'2'' 185 21 C B- C+ B+ D+ C
Ted McClain PG 6'1'' 180 25 C+ C C A+ D B
Bobby Fields PG 6'3'' 175 22 C C+ B- B D+ C
Jimmy O'Brien PG 6'1'' 170 22 C C+ B B+ D+ B
Charles Johnson PG 6'0'' 170 22 C+ C B A- C B
Dean Meminger PG 6'0'' 175 23 C A- C+ C+ C- B
John Mengelt PG 6'2'' 185 22 C A- C C+ D+ B
Charlie Lowery PG 6'3'' 185 21 C- B- C+ C C- C
Dana Pagett PG 6'2'' 180 22 C B- B+ C D- C
Charlie Davis PG 6'2'' 160 22 C C B- B- C- C
Loyd King PG 6'2'' 180 22 C B- B B D+ C
|
|
|
|
Post by styro on Feb 19, 2012 18:47:41 GMT -5
scrubs
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Feb 19, 2012 18:49:21 GMT -5
Gotta keep the PG ratings in line. They blow up like no other position.
CJ is a starter BTW.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Feb 19, 2012 18:49:39 GMT -5
Cleamons maybe too.
|
|
|
|
Post by ukfanjohn on Feb 19, 2012 18:49:42 GMT -5
McClain looks intriguing
|
|
|
|
Post by Pig on Feb 20, 2012 23:28:56 GMT -5
What the hell is with all the PG's with awful rebounding ratings.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Feb 20, 2012 23:33:05 GMT -5
What the hell is with all the PG's with awful rebounding ratings. I think in the past I didnt look as much at actual rebounding numbers for PGs. I think lack of rebounding is something that needs to be looked at more. I like that as a flaw. |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Feb 20, 2012 23:44:54 GMT -5
Jim Cleamons PG 6'3'' 185 22 B C B- B+ C B is similar to Johnson. He does shoot the 3 point shot some, which might become a negative. He is a solid inside scorer, and has a nice midrange game. Good ball handler and quickness.
Isaiah Wilson PG 6'2'' 175 23 C B- A B- D- C is a superb passer. Elite type assist numbers if he starts. He does have some handling issues unfortunately. Great man to man defender that should get a ton of steals. Cant board. Offense is mediocre.
Jimmy O'Brien PG 6'1'' 170 22 C C+ B B+ D+ B is a decent backup PG spect. He can do some scoring and some passing. Should be okay with TOs. Will get some steals. Solid late Round 1 or 2nd round selection.
Charles Johnson PG 6'0'' 170 22 C+ C B A- C B is a very efficient player. A very good FT shooter, a solid inside scorer. CJ is a great ball handler with very good quickness. Great man to man defender and very solid rebounder. No 3 point shot. Should be a starter.
Dean Meminger PG 6'0'' 175 23 C A- C+ C+ C- B is a good shooter and ball handler but he doesnt have much passing ability. Probably gonna be a pretty solid backup PG.
|
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Feb 20, 2012 23:55:34 GMT -5
What the hell is with all the PG's with awful rebounding ratings. I think in the past I didnt look as much at actual rebounding numbers for PGs. I think lack of rebounding is something that needs to be looked at more. I like that as a flaw. I think rebounding needs to be hard to come by at every position as shotblocking, great handles etc would love a 13 point 7 rebound 10 assist 1.5 turnover PG to be an amazing player |
|
|
|
Post by CC on Feb 20, 2012 23:56:30 GMT -5
wouldnt mind cj on my team.
|
|
|
|
Post by CC on Feb 20, 2012 23:57:09 GMT -5
wilson sounds intriguing though. damn.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Feb 20, 2012 23:57:43 GMT -5
I think in the past I didnt look as much at actual rebounding numbers for PGs. I think lack of rebounding is something that needs to be looked at more. I like that as a flaw. I think rebounding needs to be hard to come by at every position as shotblocking, great handles etc would love a 13 point 7 rebound 10 assist 1.5 turnover PG to be an amazing player EM! |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Feb 20, 2012 23:57:59 GMT -5
403 Em Bryant PG 12 37.1 13.0 5.7 9.4 2.1 0.3 1.2 .541 .897 1.000
|
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Feb 20, 2012 23:58:41 GMT -5
true but I cant get him...and he seems like he would be able to score more than that...a D A+ A A- C PG would be fun
|
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Feb 21, 2012 0:02:16 GMT -5
actually, I wonder what a D A+ A A- C PG could do
|
|
