|
Post by aar on Jan 11, 2012 16:52:39 GMT -5
If you take some of my players for cap and then trade them back to me at a later date, I am making the Mavs 1st in this upcoming draft available.
Essentially, you take Joe Caldwell, Julian Hammond and Barry Clemens, you get the 1st and then you trade them back to me after FA.
Let me know if you have around 10 mil. in cap to do so.
|
|
|
Post by greeme on Jan 11, 2012 17:02:45 GMT -5
I'm pretty sure this isn't allowed but If it is I would probably be interested
|
|
|
Post by jahallstar on Jan 11, 2012 17:19:10 GMT -5
Why would it not be allowed? ...also I may be able to help aar...let me see my cap number at the flip.
|
|
|
Post by aar on Jan 11, 2012 22:25:09 GMT -5
Why would it not be allowed? ...also I may be able to help aar...let me see my cap number at the flip. Cool
|
|
|
Post by aar on Jan 11, 2012 22:25:34 GMT -5
I'm pretty sure this isn't allowed but If it is I would probably be interested I'm pretty sure it's been done before. Let me know if you're interested
|
|
|
Post by Jordan on Jan 11, 2012 23:23:17 GMT -5
I can't help
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jan 12, 2012 12:16:45 GMT -5
Just have to follow the trade back rules.
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Jan 12, 2012 15:34:05 GMT -5
meh trading a player just to get cap for FA, to get him back later seems a lot like tampering
|
|
|
Post by Play on Jan 12, 2012 15:45:37 GMT -5
meh trading a player just to get cap for FA, to get him back later seems a lot like tampering not at all ive done it several times
|
|
|
Post by greeme on Jan 12, 2012 15:54:26 GMT -5
meh trading a player just to get cap for FA, to get him back later seems a lot like tampering not at all ive done it several times Fire play
|
|
|
Post by aar on Jan 12, 2012 16:33:04 GMT -5
meh trading a player just to get cap for FA, to get him back later seems a lot like tampering Even if there's compensation?
|
|
|
Post by aar on Jan 13, 2012 23:31:51 GMT -5
Bump
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Jan 13, 2012 23:33:57 GMT -5
meh trading a player just to get cap for FA, to get him back later seems a lot like tampering Even if there's compensation? yes because the entire point of the deal is a tradeback, didnt ever notice play doing it, but, he also probably didnt make it so public
|
|
|
Post by aar on Jan 13, 2012 23:34:38 GMT -5
Even if there's compensation? yes because the entire point of the deal is a tradeback, didnt ever notice play doing it, but, he also probably didnt make it so public So then trade backs should be banished by that logic
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Jan 13, 2012 23:35:38 GMT -5
yes because the entire point of the deal is a tradeback, didnt ever notice play doing it, but, he also probably didnt make it so public So then trade backs should be banished by that logic no, because thats the back half of another trade...this is a trade done just to tradeback...
|
|