|
|
Post by Spencer on Dec 12, 2011 15:59:11 GMT -5
Al Salvadori PF 6'9'' 220 22 C+ C D+ C+ B C
Matthew Aitch PF 6'7'' 230 23 B D+ D+ C+ B C
Mike Lynn PF 6'7'' 215 21 C+ C D+ B C+ C
Al Tucker PF 6'8'' 190 24 B- C C- B C+ B
Keith Swagerty PF 6'7'' 235 22 B- C- C- B C+ C
Mel Daniels PF 6'9'' 220 23 C+ B D+ C B- A
Craig Raymond PF 6'11'' 235 22 B- C- D+ B+ B- B
Dave Lattin PF 6'6'' 225 23 C+ C- D+ B B+ C
Tom Workman PF 6'7'' 218 22 B- C- C- B- C+ C
Sam Smith PF 6'7'' 230 23 B C- C B+ C+ B
Willie Davis PF 6'8'' 234 22 C+ C- C- B+ C+ B
Randolph Mahaffey PF 6'7'' 210 22 B- C D+ C+ C+ B
Gary Gregor PF 6'7'' 225 22 B+ C- D+ C+ C+ B
|
|
|
|
Post by Akomplice on Dec 12, 2011 16:09:29 GMT -5
Mel Daniels I guess.
|
|
|
|
Post by Juju Erving on Dec 12, 2011 17:23:51 GMT -5
all meh
|
|
|
|
Post by ukfanjohn on Dec 12, 2011 17:42:42 GMT -5
nother weak PF class
|
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Dec 12, 2011 19:11:50 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Dec 13, 2011 1:42:03 GMT -5
Mel Daniels PF 6'9'' 220 23 C+ B D+ C B- A is an extremely talented big man that could go as high as #1. He can score inside and out with a great 3 point shot for a big man. Daniels is also a solid rebounder. But his best attribute is his shot blocking. Daniels might get as many as 3 a game as a rookie. Big time talent.
Craig Raymond PF 6'11'' 235 22 B- C- D+ B+ B- B is a solid big man. Good rebounder and post defender. Not overly athletic, and not much for offense. Raymond should be a solid mid 1st Round selection.
Sam Smith PF 6'7'' 230 23 B C- C B+ C+ B is a solid undersized PF that can block and steal. Only decent offensively, Smith is a big time athlete with above average hops. Smith also isnt a great rebounder. Might be a better fit at SF.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Dec 13, 2011 1:42:19 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by BRB on Dec 13, 2011 1:45:32 GMT -5
Guessing Daniels has shitty post D? Is he more of a SF then?
|
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Dec 13, 2011 1:48:22 GMT -5
damn Daniels
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Dec 13, 2011 1:51:03 GMT -5
Guessing Daniels has shitty post D? Is he more of a SF then? Shitty post D, but even worse perimeter D. Hes a C defense PF or C that can block shots. With potential he could be B eventually. |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Dec 13, 2011 1:51:19 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by aar on Dec 13, 2011 16:43:50 GMT -5
Mel Daniels looks great!
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Dec 16, 2011 0:45:07 GMT -5
He is.
|
|
|
|
Post by aar on Dec 17, 2011 7:28:14 GMT -5
Would Al Tucker be better as an SF?
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Dec 17, 2011 20:35:25 GMT -5
Would Al Tucker be better as an SF? Looks like that may be the case. He isn't very quick though. |
|
