|
|
Post by Spencer on Oct 7, 2011 12:29:27 GMT -5
Ira Harge C 6'9'' 225 22 B- C- D+ B B B
Ray Cronk C 7'4'' 250 21 C C- C C+ C C
Hugh Evans C 6'10'' 235 21 C D+ C C+ C C
Marv Straw C 6'10'' 265 22 C+ D C C+ C C
Bill Raftery C 6'9'' 225 22 C+ C- D+ B- B- C
Connie McGuire C 6'10'' 239 22 C C D- B+ C C
Bob Walter C 6'10'' 245 22 C C D B- C+ C
Ron Pickett C 6'11'' 225 22 C C- C C C+ C
Tom Hoover C 6'9'' 230 22 B C D+ B- B+ B
Nate Thurmond C 6'11'' 225 22 C+ C- D- B B+ A
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Oct 7, 2011 12:58:57 GMT -5
Nate Thurmond C 6'11'' 225 22 C+ C- D- B B+ A
Bam.
|
|
|
|
Post by svedda on Oct 7, 2011 13:19:41 GMT -5
Nate plz.
|
|
|
|
Post by aar on Oct 7, 2011 13:24:50 GMT -5
AWESOME
|
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Oct 7, 2011 13:55:27 GMT -5
meh Nate looks pretty shitty, D- handles, shitty offensive game...hopefully not a turnover whore defensive big.
Hoover looks pretty good though
|
|
|
|
Post by Akomplice on Oct 7, 2011 14:57:14 GMT -5
Harge looks solid, Nate is Nate. Weak class overall compared to the previous ones though, still Nate.
|
|
|
|
Post by thomaslyttle on Oct 7, 2011 15:48:47 GMT -5
Tom Hoover C 6'9'' 230 22 B C D+ B- B+ B
|
|
|
|
Post by repole ಠ_ಠ on Oct 10, 2011 12:55:42 GMT -5
Hoover could be awesome depending on notes...
|
|
|
|
Post by Jeff on Oct 10, 2011 12:57:41 GMT -5
Not really that high on Nate.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Oct 10, 2011 23:18:07 GMT -5
Ira Harge C 6'9'' 225 22 B- C- D+ B B B is a solid post player. He isnt a great scorer but he's decent enough. Defensively he's solid and can block some shots. Harge is also a solid rebounder, especially on the defensive glass.
Tom Hoover C 6'9'' 230 22 B C D+ B- B+ B is a pretty solid post scorer and rebounder. Hoover is a nice scorer on the block and a good FT shooter. He even has 3 point range. Defensively he isnt much, and he wont block shots. He is a nice rebounder though.
Nate Thurmond C 6'11'' 225 22 C+ C- D- B B+ A is a stud shot blocker with big upside. He is so strong and such a good rebounder. Offensively he's raw but with his upside he should be okay eventually. Defensively he should be a monster. A A defense and rebounding is completely reasonable eventually.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jeff on Oct 10, 2011 23:20:02 GMT -5
Thurmond looks slightly better.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ab-Soul on Oct 11, 2011 0:06:19 GMT -5
thurmond gonna have TO issues?
|
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Oct 11, 2011 0:51:01 GMT -5
blegh Hoover is meh and Nates a role player
|
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Oct 11, 2011 0:58:06 GMT -5
Thurmond is a role player, Miles is meh, no D, but at least decent, Gus is old, no blocks, Jones is a TO whore, Walt has just decent handles and raw inside/outside, Sloan has Raw offense, and no 3 pointer, Caldwell has C- outside AND a three pointer, makes him trash.
There is nobody even close to worth wasting the number one pick on this year...Amazing draft to tank
|
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Oct 11, 2011 1:01:28 GMT -5
all these guys are worthy of a 5 or so selection...
|
|
