|
Post by brophdog88 on Aug 15, 2011 16:39:29 GMT -5
Slick is probably too high, should be right with jones probably, though it will be interesting to see how the move to PG effects him
|
|
|
Post by CC on Aug 15, 2011 16:39:39 GMT -5
russell @ 5 = ill vote 5.
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Aug 15, 2011 16:41:09 GMT -5
Russell is too high, I just dont see his offense ever being a plus, which means he is a Drummond type....great for winning but never a true star
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Aug 15, 2011 16:42:23 GMT -5
Id put Purnell and barker over him for sure
|
|
|
Post by Jordan on Aug 15, 2011 16:45:43 GMT -5
Russell is too high, I just dont see his offense ever being a plus, which means he is a Drummond type....great for winning but never a true star
|
|
|
Post by Jordan on Aug 15, 2011 16:46:00 GMT -5
Russell is not top 10 or 15 in value imo
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Aug 15, 2011 16:46:00 GMT -5
why does heinsohn suck so much? seems like he should be dominant....anyway, just looking at ratings, he and petit are very similar, and while that A scouted looks nice for petit, he most certainly does not have A potential, probably very similar to Heinsohn...heinsohn is outta position at SF, but, I dont see a 20 spot difference between the two
|
|
|
Post by Jordan on Aug 15, 2011 16:46:07 GMT -5
just a big name
|
|
|
Post by Jordan on Aug 15, 2011 16:46:37 GMT -5
I thought slick was way too high as well... moving him to PG probably isn't helping that either
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Aug 15, 2011 16:47:26 GMT -5
McCracken should probably fall off this list
*waits for Play to bitch*
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Aug 15, 2011 16:48:24 GMT -5
I thought slick was way too high as well... moving him to PG probably isn't helping that either yeah, questionable...it really hurt Ramsey, Slick has the blocks and steals though it may not kill him, may be pretty good there, still 13 is too high
|
|
|
Post by Stannis Baratheon on Aug 15, 2011 16:49:38 GMT -5
what is this some kind of sick joke?
|
|
|
Post by Stannis Baratheon on Aug 15, 2011 16:49:44 GMT -5
not funny at all skillz
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Aug 15, 2011 16:51:05 GMT -5
Id switch Hundley and Greer, at least
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Aug 15, 2011 16:52:25 GMT -5
ok, Ill say it, I think Rudy should be higher...for once I havent rc'd a guy out already, and on a good team he is putting up very efficient numbers, outside his foul whoreish ness
226 Rudy LaRusso C 51 32.8 14.4 9.3 2.7 0.8 1.5 1.0 .471 .869 .000
|
|