|
|
Post by nova on Jul 20, 2011 11:37:04 GMT -5
Solid stuff. Alf and Flint are so sick together.
|
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Jul 20, 2011 11:37:24 GMT -5
Paulson is massive oversight to
|
|
|
|
Post by Play on Jul 20, 2011 11:37:24 GMT -5
Purnell at 7 is a fucking joke....If he played in NY he would be #1. And where the fuck is Jason Paulson? |
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Jul 20, 2011 11:38:35 GMT -5
Ramsey ahead of who? I rank all of the wings ahead of him slightly higher. I suppose at PG he'd be more valuable of Albert Smith. I want lots of criticism. Gonna keep updating this list. ahead of jones, jv, qd, kerr, bruton, white, o'keane (those last three by a wide margin), and definitely stokes, who doesnt belong anywhere near 20th I massively overrate my players and yet I agree stokes at 20 is too High |
|
|
|
Post by nova on Jul 20, 2011 11:39:12 GMT -5
As someone who's done these lists before, it's really really tough to get everyone in and have people agree with your choices. There's just a ton of factors - ratings, stats, age, etc.
Props to Skillz for doing it. It's a bitch.
|
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Jul 20, 2011 11:39:30 GMT -5
Purnell at 7 is a fucking joke....If he played in NY he would be #1. And where the fuck is Jason Paulson? Hmmm Paulson was ahead of McCracken and towards the top 20 originally. I must have forgotten him. |
|
|
|
Post by CC on Jul 20, 2011 11:39:30 GMT -5
russ @ 3. the most valuable big in BBS.
|
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Jul 20, 2011 11:40:09 GMT -5
I'd put Quincy ahead of Green though Think Green is a better player |
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Jul 20, 2011 11:40:41 GMT -5
Yeah and i realize a lot of this is debatable, which is why i'm asking for comments to edit.
|
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Jul 20, 2011 11:41:42 GMT -5
But no chance Ramsey should be ahead of jones... Potential does play a part and both players are about even
|
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Jul 20, 2011 11:43:50 GMT -5
russ @ 3. the most valuable big in BBS. For the one yeAr before wilt shows up |
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Jul 20, 2011 11:44:20 GMT -5
Wilt probably goes straight to the top no?
|
|
|
|
Post by Haberino on Jul 20, 2011 11:44:44 GMT -5
But no chance Ramsey should be ahead of jones... Potential does play a part and both players are about even lol they're not nearly even |
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Jul 20, 2011 11:46:38 GMT -5
Did some edits. Paulson at 23. Moved Ramsay and Smith up, O'Keane down.
I moved Stokes down a little but i love the guy. Shot blocking/rebounding at his age and potential?
Also Broph you overrate Sam Jones
|
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Jul 20, 2011 11:47:22 GMT -5
But no chance Ramsey should be ahead of jones... Potential does play a part and both players are about even lol they're not nearly even 542 Sam Jones SF 54 34.8 18.3 6.1 2.6 2.3 1.4 1.0 .450 .845 .000 506 Frank Ramsey PG 47 37.3 18.9 6.9 5.0 2.1 0.6 1.2 .456 .852 .417 No not at all |
|
