|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Jul 20, 2011 12:11:25 GMT -5
As for stokes, as sick as he is he isn't going to be a great offensive player ever so he loses value there vs guys that have that all around potential
|
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Jul 20, 2011 12:12:12 GMT -5
0.6 spg and 0.6 bpg is a pretty big difference LOL. That's + 1.2 on a turnover gap and the difference between 0.6 steals and 0.6 blocks is probably 15-20 rating points each. Also the %'s and to margin means more to me than rebounds.
|
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Jul 20, 2011 12:12:19 GMT -5
Paulson's on a team with 3 other superstars and is scoring at a higher rate, more efficiently, blocks and steals more, and is a much better defend. That makes up for the rebounding. The arguement that he's on a team with 3 other superstars is absolutely the worst possible arguement you can possibly come up with. He averages 0.6 spg and 0.6 bpg I don't see how that's signficantly better. It hardly makes up for the rebounding. And fewer turnovers |
|
|
|
Post by repole ಠ_ಠ on Jul 20, 2011 12:12:40 GMT -5
Paulson shoots the 3 better, shoots FTs better, turns the ball over less, blocks more shots, and steals the ball more often.
It may look like small differences, but it adds up, and IMO eclipses the rebounding advantage White has.
|
|
|
|
Post by greeme on Jul 20, 2011 12:13:25 GMT -5
green is so overrated
i"m not saying that he is not really good but he should be much lower on the list
i think the grizz gms constant claims of omar's greatness just got to you
Why is he better than Vince? Vince gets 3 more rbs and 3 more assists per game, shoots great %s and turns the ball over less.
|
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Jul 20, 2011 12:26:17 GMT -5
3 more
|
|
|
|
Post by Haberino on Jul 20, 2011 12:52:24 GMT -5
lol, ramsey's efg is 6 points higher and he'd be doing 25+ in that awful offense. jones has steals and blocks by a total of 1 a night on ramsey, and everywhere else ramsey owns him
|
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Jul 20, 2011 12:55:34 GMT -5
oh, so I cant say Rollins would do 28, but you can claim Ramsey would do 25...got it
|
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Jul 20, 2011 12:56:50 GMT -5
never done more than 20 even lol
|
|
|
|
Post by Juju Erving on Jul 20, 2011 12:57:18 GMT -5
Hagan sighting
|
|
|
|
Post by Haberino on Jul 20, 2011 12:59:48 GMT -5
oh, so I cant say Rollins would do 28, but you can claim Ramsey would do 25...got it when did i ever object to you saying rollins could do 28? i thought you were right about him. do you seriously not think ramsey would be scoring 25 as your top option? look at the other scorers i have. can you actually disagree that that is taking away from ramsey's scoring? |
|
|
|
Post by Haberino on Jul 20, 2011 13:00:27 GMT -5
never done more than 20 even lol i like how you say never when he's in his second season and has spent both of them as either a third or non-option. valid point for sure. |
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Jul 20, 2011 13:01:10 GMT -5
oh, so I cant say Rollins would do 28, but you can claim Ramsey would do 25...got it when did i ever object to you saying rollins could do 28? i thought you were right about him. do you seriously not think ramsey would be scoring 25 as your top option? look at the other scorers i have. can you actually disagree that that is taking away from ramsey's scoring? no I dont, cause my guys take a bunch of shots, its not like I dont have scorers, I just have very innefficient ones... |
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Jul 20, 2011 13:01:52 GMT -5
its about value, not talent, and Jones obviously shows more potential
|
|
|
|
Post by Haberino on Jul 20, 2011 13:02:26 GMT -5
you can say he's never done more than 20 but you'll keep pointing to jones being a rookie. alright, well ramsey was rookie a grand total of a season ago, and his rookie numbers are so far better than jones that there's no comparison. rookie season efg was nearly eight points higher than jones'. not even close
|
|
