|
Post by Martinez on Jul 7, 2011 12:02:06 GMT -5
248 Rashid Muhammad SF 22 6'9'' 235 B- C+ B- A B B 334 Douglas Washington SG 26 6'7'' 213 B+ B+ B+ A- C C 370 Kemba Walker SG 35 6'0'' 183 C+ A- B- B+ C- F 308 Ben Bass SG 24 6'3'' 219 C A- C+ B+ D+ C 513 Kyle Barton SG 22 6'3'' 211 B- B+ C B D C 579 Caleb Gomelsky SG 35 6'5'' 209 C B- C- D C D 145 Jackson MaCauley PG 26 6'4'' 210 C+ A C+ C+ D+ C 468 Josh Selby PG 33 6'1'' 187 C+ A- C B+ D D 363 Bob Carney PG 23 6'3'' 170 B C A C+ C+ B 93 George Gulick PG 25 5'7'' 180 D+ B- C A- C- D 196 Patrick Bryant PG 25 6'2'' 205 C C B- B D C 637 Oscar Ekezie PG 26 6'5'' 210 C+ C+ B- C C A
|
|
|
Post by Martinez on Jul 7, 2011 12:02:34 GMT -5
wasn't there a Nanz rule made for this?
|
|
|
Post by Play on Jul 7, 2011 12:03:36 GMT -5
its pretty pathetic
But CC is allowed to do anything he wants.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jul 7, 2011 12:13:02 GMT -5
No rule against acquiring players at certain positions. Its been done before and Im fine with it.
|
|
|
Post by Martinez on Jul 7, 2011 12:19:19 GMT -5
weird 99.9% certain you called out Nanz on this many years ago
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jul 7, 2011 12:20:23 GMT -5
weird 99.9% certain you called out Nanz on this many years ago I remember allowing Manas to do it. I dont remember saying anything to Nanz. IDK. Maybe I did, I think I wouldve changed the tanking rule though.
|
|
|
Post by Ab-Soul on Jul 7, 2011 12:20:56 GMT -5
meh at this
|
|
|
Post by Martinez on Jul 7, 2011 12:21:14 GMT -5
so then why do we need to start a PG listed as PG then?
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jul 7, 2011 12:22:30 GMT -5
so then why do we need to start a PG listed as PG then? Because the purpose and intent of the rule is different. Dont see any relevance between this and the PG rule.
|
|
|
Post by Martinez on Jul 7, 2011 12:23:22 GMT -5
yes it is if I want to have a team with no PGs why can't i? If teams are allowed to play with no PF and no C why can't I play with no PG?
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jul 7, 2011 12:26:56 GMT -5
yes it is if I want to have a team with no PGs why can't i? If teams are allowed to play with no PF and no C why can't I play with no PG? lol, because of the rules. That would be breaking the rules. Not having a C or PF isnt breaking the rules. Pretty simple.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jul 7, 2011 12:30:31 GMT -5
CC also gives me free carmel macchiatos!
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jul 7, 2011 12:30:44 GMT -5
SO ya.
|
|
|
Post by Martinez on Jul 7, 2011 12:31:27 GMT -5
carmel
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jul 7, 2011 12:31:45 GMT -5
What did I put?
|
|