|
|
Post by Spencer on Jun 29, 2011 15:11:50 GMT -5
Hal Lear PG 6'0'' 163 22 C B D+ B+ C- A
Phil Rollins PG 6'2'' 185 22 C A- C C+ D B
Jim Ray PG 6'1'' 180 22 C+ C+ C+ C+ C- C
Saul Mariaschin PG 5'11'' 165 32 C B B C D- B
|
|
|
|
Post by repole ಠ_ಠ on Jun 29, 2011 15:13:23 GMT -5
league is so PG heavy now, glad to see a weak class.
|
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Jun 29, 2011 15:15:57 GMT -5
Lol class sucks, which is why I gotta get barker or purnell or Beals
|
|
|
|
Post by ukfanjohn on Jun 29, 2011 17:32:37 GMT -5
Damn.
|
|
|
|
Post by styro on Jun 30, 2011 19:28:48 GMT -5
gross
|
|
|
|
Post by Jeff on Jul 1, 2011 8:33:22 GMT -5
How is Lear a PG. D+ handles?
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jul 2, 2011 11:54:23 GMT -5
Saul Mariaschin PG 5'11'' 165 32 C B B C D- B is probably just a backup but he has some solid features to his game. First off he is a crazy ball handler. He will have very low TOs. Secondly he is a great jump shooter. Nice midrange game, very nice FT shooter. Lastly, he can get steals. Hed probably be a top 15 ball stealer with starters minutes.
Phil Rollins PG 6'2'' 185 22 C A- C C+ D B is a good shooter. Very good midrange with a decent 3 point shot. Rollins is a decent ball handler but not much of a passer. defense and rebounding are mediocre to poor. Probably just a backup.
Hal Lear PG 6'0'' 163 22 C B D+ B+ C- A isnt a prototypical PG but he should be good. Lear is a very good midrange shooter and a solid defender. Lear can guard man to man and get steals. Lear doesnt pass much but he shouldnt turn it over much either. Most importantly he has upside. Definite lotto pick.
|
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Jul 2, 2011 11:56:10 GMT -5
Bet Lear will be good
|
|
|
|
Post by Jeff on Jul 3, 2011 3:36:46 GMT -5
Lear is very interesting. The low TO thing is appealing. Ricky Francis 2.0.
|
|
|
|
Post by SparkBarea on Jul 3, 2011 14:54:29 GMT -5
lol. Thanks God i dont need a PG. This class sucks.
|
|
