|
Post by Martinez on Dec 13, 2010 10:44:13 GMT -5
"ok I like it let me run it by spence" "no thanks by 2014 noh will be good and in 2016 okc will suck and want their pick back" Yup haberman is going to want that one specific first in 2016 If you are going to quote someone at least cut and paste correctly. I didn't cut and paste
|
|
|
Post by greeme on Dec 13, 2010 10:53:22 GMT -5
If you are going to quote someone at least cut and paste correctly. I didn't cut and paste that is why you misquoted me. you should have cut and paste
|
|
|
Post by Martinez on Dec 13, 2010 11:44:27 GMT -5
that is why you misquoted me. you should have cut and paste "ok I like it let me run it by spence" "no thanks by 2014 noh will be good and in 2016 okc will suck and want their pick back" Yup haberman is going to want that one specific first in 2016 can you please explain to me how what I said is completely different than what you said?
|
|
Erbes
Senior Member
Posts: 6,111
|
Post by Erbes on Dec 13, 2010 11:46:08 GMT -5
Lulz @ greeme. Blushes again.
|
|
|
Post by greeme on Dec 13, 2010 11:58:34 GMT -5
Are you really incapable of seeing the differences by yourself? I wrote that NO should be ok You wrote that I said that they will be good. There are two differences between those statements. Can you spot them? Regarding okc I wrote that they should be trying to rebuild by 2016. You wrote that I said they will suck. Do you really not see the difference?
|
|
|
Post by Martinez on Dec 13, 2010 12:00:32 GMT -5
Are you really incapable of seeing the differences by yourself? I wrote that NO should be ok You wrote that I said that they will be good. There are two differences between those statements. Can you spot them? Regarding okc I wrote that they should be trying to rebuild by 2016. You wrote that I said they will suck. Do you really not see the difference? wow.
|
|
|
Post by Andrew on Dec 13, 2010 12:04:18 GMT -5
Pretty sure Marty gets majority vote here, which is very rare indeed.
|
|
|
Post by Mark on Dec 13, 2010 12:17:51 GMT -5
so for my own clarification, greeme was dealing the NO and OKC picks in the proposed deals right
|
|
|
Post by Martinez on Dec 13, 2010 12:20:47 GMT -5
so for my own clarification, greeme was dealing the NO and OKC picks in the proposed deals right whut?
|
|
|
Post by Martinez on Dec 13, 2010 12:22:37 GMT -5
I posted this:
then he said I "misquoted him" so I posted the PMs
so apparently since I used good instead of OK and suck instead of rebuild it was a direct misquote.
|
|
|
Post by greeme on Dec 13, 2010 12:24:07 GMT -5
so for my own clarification, greeme was dealing the NO and OKC picks in the proposed deals right what deals? there was only one deal
|
|
|
Post by greeme on Dec 13, 2010 12:35:13 GMT -5
I posted this: then he said I "misquoted him" so I posted the PMs I like it. Let my run it by spencer. no thanks by 2014 no should be ok by 2016 okc should be trying to rebuild and will want their pick[/quote] so apparently since I used good instead of OK and suck instead of rebuild it was a direct misquote.[/quote] more or less. To be exact you also used the word "will" instead of "should". "Will' implies a much more definitive statement. For example - if I say "The Clippers will continue sucking next year bc their gm has no idea what he is doing" that is a statement of a very firmly held opinion. On the other hand if I say "The Clippers should suck next year" that would be a less firmly held opinion. Let's try it again "The Clippers will get swept by the Nuggets in their season series bc the Clippers gm has no idea how to fill out a depth chart" - strongly held opinion. "The Clippers should probably get swept by the Nuggets" - less firmly held opinion.
|
|
|
Post by Martinez on Dec 13, 2010 12:37:38 GMT -5
..........
|
|
|
Post by Play on Dec 13, 2010 12:40:35 GMT -5
lol at needing approval for trading a first for a first... the OKC first is useless considering his futures are spread out with 3 different teams Both firsts are pretty useless right now. At least the OKC pick is farther away awwww helping out one of your former classmates...how cute
|
|
Matthew
Full Member
Ex-GM
Posts: 4,558
|
Post by Matthew on Dec 13, 2010 12:45:01 GMT -5
Haha
|
|