|
Post by Play on Dec 5, 2011 12:15:49 GMT -5
nobody gives a fuck about authzen....
|
|
|
Post by svedda on Dec 5, 2011 12:15:52 GMT -5
Play, you can stop the mega trolling, its getting old. If anybody is a fraud in the BCS, well ok thats Virginia Tech, but after that its clearly Michigan. See, unlike Oregon, who actually won its conference, three straight. Michigan had to sneak into the top 14. And dont give me the BS about "USC being the conference Champs...see, they woulda had to come to Autzen and win again, not to mention, even under the old system they still would not have been conference champs, they lost to Stanford, and to Arizona State by 20+. So yeah...oh, and their scholarship reductions dont kick in til next year lol...Did you even watch any Michigan games this season...If it wasn't for the refs screwing us in the Iowa game...we would only have 1 loss Michigan didn't really beat anybody and was one good Braxton pass from losing.
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Dec 5, 2011 12:16:06 GMT -5
you were saying it like beating a team who has their players leave for the NFL is somehow devalued...I mean, its clear teams lose players every year, so why say without Barkley how big of you barkley is the best qb in the conference and yall couldn't beat him at home this season. Guaranteeing a win next season is pretty dumb. like yea, let's beat them when they downgrade! So anytime a team beats somebody that has a player leave for the NFL you cant talk about that? I mean what sense does it make. Teams lose players to the NFL all the time, but of course beating said team is completely worthless because we didnt beat them with all their best players ever? Seriously stop shitting yourself Styro, Oregon is 2-1 against barkley anyway. Teams are going to lose players regardless, you play with the players that are in your program year to year
|
|
|
Post by styro on Dec 5, 2011 12:16:16 GMT -5
lol...Did you even watch any Michigan games this season...If it wasn't for the refs screwing us in the Iowa game...we would only have 1 loss Michigan didn't really beat anybody and was one good Braxton pass from losing. lol. one good pass from braxton is the equivalent of a hail mary
|
|
|
Post by Play on Dec 5, 2011 12:16:18 GMT -5
Oregon sucks omfg just shut up.
|
|
|
Post by styro on Dec 5, 2011 12:17:26 GMT -5
barkley is the best qb in the conference and yall couldn't beat him at home this season. Guaranteeing a win next season is pretty dumb. like yea, let's beat them when they downgrade! So anytime a team beats somebody that has a player leave for the NFL you cant talk about that? I mean what sense does it make. Teams lose players to the NFL all the time, but of course beating said team is completely worthless because we didnt beat them with all their best players ever? Seriously stop shitting yourself Styro, Oregon is 2-1 against barkley anyway. Teams are going to lose players regardless, you play with the players that are in your program year to year the one shitting on yourself is you. LOL @ bringing all their players ever into the conversation. Way to correlate one year of staying to decades of history. USC is the best team in the pac 12 this season...period. that's the point we're trying to make...
|
|
|
Post by svedda on Dec 5, 2011 12:17:32 GMT -5
Michigan didn't really beat anybody and was one good Braxton pass from losing. lol. one good pass from braxton is the equivalent of a hail mary 0_0
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Dec 5, 2011 12:17:50 GMT -5
yea, we lost at home by 3! but give us a second chance!!! umm, no, THERE IS A BUILT IN SECOND CHANCE. USC had two conference losses, so unless you consider any team who beat USC in their prime years the conference champion, it doesnt matter what happened. Oregon had one conference loss, USC had two...and the whole USC>Oregon>Stanford>USC thing, well, only two of those teams had 1 loss in conference
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Dec 5, 2011 12:18:36 GMT -5
So anytime a team beats somebody that has a player leave for the NFL you cant talk about that? I mean what sense does it make. Teams lose players to the NFL all the time, but of course beating said team is completely worthless because we didnt beat them with all their best players ever? Seriously stop shitting yourself Styro, Oregon is 2-1 against barkley anyway. Teams are going to lose players regardless, you play with the players that are in your program year to year the one shitting on yourself is you. LOL @ bringing all their players ever into the conversation. Way to correlate one year of staying to decades of history. USC is the best team in the pac 12 this season...period. that's the point we're trying to make... USC lost to Arizona State AND Stanford, so coongrats.. or I guess we hand Oregon State the conference title in 2009
|
|
|
Post by styro on Dec 5, 2011 12:19:16 GMT -5
should be no problem though. usc is back. finally giving the pac 12 some credibility.
yes, ucla doesn't belong, before you get that shot in right quick.
|
|
|
Post by svedda on Dec 5, 2011 12:20:20 GMT -5
Not sure why Harvard didn't get a BCS bid over Oregon.
|
|
|
Post by Play on Dec 5, 2011 12:20:20 GMT -5
should be no problem though. usc is back. finally giving the pac 12 some credibility.
|
|
|
Post by Play on Dec 5, 2011 12:21:26 GMT -5
I can't wait until Oregon gets raped by Wisconsin and the best back in the country.
Okst is going to shit on stanford as well
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Dec 5, 2011 12:22:54 GMT -5
should be no problem though. usc is back. finally giving the pac 12 some credibility. yes, ucla doesn't belong, before you get that shot in right quick. why would I have to even mention UCLA? anyway, as I said, hold off on saying USC is back and all, they have yet to suffer from any of the scholarship reductions, that doesnt kick in til this class, followed by the ones over the next few years
|
|
|
Post by svedda on Dec 5, 2011 12:23:28 GMT -5
Virginia Tech will curb stomp Michigan.
|
|