|
|
Post by Martinez on Dec 3, 2009 14:59:33 GMT -5
if you upgraded his passing and not his handling you are in trouble
|
|
|
|
Post by nova on Dec 3, 2009 15:00:49 GMT -5
yeah but why would you trade 3 future 1sts on a player that will eventually be better instead of adding to someone ready to play now before Jordan hits an eventual decline. Jordan is in his prime so you add players to their prime.. by the time Cliff gets into his prime Jordan will be at least 30. Because I don't love Adams, and I feel like Jordan will be great for 6-7 seasons at least, and probably only improve from here. He's only 27. And he has A scouted...Cliff will be quite good in a year or two, I believe that. Plus, no guarantee I'll hold onto Cliff that long, I may deal him. I feel he has more value then Adams, and I like him more then him. Pretty simple why I did it. |
|
|
|
Post by nova on Dec 3, 2009 15:01:19 GMT -5
if you upgraded his passing and not his handling you are in trouble Lol. cause he averaged 3 turnovers a game over 3 games? Yeah. He's clearly a huge TO guy. |
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Dec 3, 2009 15:12:35 GMT -5
love it for mark
i actually agree with chris here. adams would have been a better fit.
|
|
|
|
Post by DB on Dec 3, 2009 15:30:18 GMT -5
good amount of picks
|
|
|
|
Post by Jeff on Dec 3, 2009 17:01:45 GMT -5
Not sure if there are any NBN guys who will remember this, but this is a typical Jimmy move. Either "I would have given more" or "You could have gotten my guy for cheaper" after every trade.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Dec 3, 2009 23:26:34 GMT -5
Marques Sparrow?
|
|
|
|
Post by Jeff on Dec 3, 2009 23:27:46 GMT -5
Not sure what you are getting at here? |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Dec 3, 2009 23:30:17 GMT -5
trade in
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Dec 3, 2009 23:30:41 GMT -5
Not sure what you are getting at here? The fact that he doesnt exist? |
|
