|
Post by Spencer on Nov 26, 2009 12:22:39 GMT -5
I think its cyclical. I think not allowing teams to rebuild properly forced them to constantly struggle to stay competitive. Who couldn't rebuild properly? If it takes you more than three seasons to build properly, that's pathetic. All this is gonna do is let inactive/mediocre guys like Galo was in the last BBS hang around and suck for longer. Or, it'll let teams tank for four years and build ridiculous teams just by having their own picks, which is dumb and unfair. This is terrible. lol, it doesnt help to be so negative. Aaron, it isnt terrible. I can see if you dont like it, but it isnt terrible. It isnt something that deserves this kind of reaction IMO. its just a small thing to help allow teams to rebuild properly.
|
|
|
Post by CC on Nov 26, 2009 12:23:07 GMT -5
Sounds good.
|
|
|
Post by Haberino on Nov 26, 2009 12:26:03 GMT -5
Who couldn't rebuild properly? If it takes you more than three seasons to build properly, that's pathetic. All this is gonna do is let inactive/mediocre guys like Galo was in the last BBS hang around and suck for longer. Or, it'll let teams tank for four years and build ridiculous teams just by having their own picks, which is dumb and unfair. This is terrible. lol, it doesnt help to be so negative. Aaron, it isnt terrible. I can see if you dont like it, but it isnt terrible. It isnt something that deserves this kind of reaction IMO. its just a small thing to help allow teams to rebuild properly. Tanking used to be a huge problem, and this opens the door for that again. I think the way the poll is worded is really misleading. I'm sorry to be negative about this but it's a terrible idea. Nobody ever complained about the CY in the last BBS because it worked perfectly. Great GMs still built great teams, and the only guys getting fired were shitty GMs - Donatello, Galo, etc. There was never a time when a guy get fired and the general reaction was, "he was doing a great job with that team and would've had something great if he had another year to tank." It was always a matter of lesser GMs who weren't active not being able to build good teams. I don't get why those kinda GMs should be allowed to have another season to suck. It's not like the CY rushed anyone who was worth their spot.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Nov 26, 2009 12:26:55 GMT -5
K, Ill start a new poll.
|
|