|
Post by Outlawz on Dec 30, 2009 21:54:23 GMT -5
would be great if i can see who gives what
|
|
|
Post by nova on Dec 30, 2009 22:02:28 GMT -5
I voted a 2.
I'm voting based off of what my article got. It got a 4, so I'm judging off that.
This is just a few Q&A's, not hard to do, so I can't justify giving it more then a 2 if mine only got a 4.
|
|
|
Post by Outlawz on Dec 30, 2009 22:08:55 GMT -5
jah's ranking got a 4.. shit dont make sense.. my last article shoulda 4 but i got a 3 and probably took me longer than yours considering i did mine on my phone.. but its your opinion just wanted to know what peoples thought process was.. thx for the feedback
|
|
|
Post by nova on Dec 30, 2009 22:17:43 GMT -5
No way your last article deserved a 4, sorry. It was solid, I gave it a 3, but no way is that a 4. It sucks that it took so long cause you did it on your phone, but still, it wasn't a 4.
The bar has been set, a 5 is basically gonna take a huge effort.
this is between a 2 and a 3, I just don't think it deserves a 3 if this is the scale we're using with mine as a 4 and your other one as a 3.
|
|
|
Post by Outlawz on Dec 30, 2009 22:20:45 GMT -5
I think a 1 or 2 should be a bullshit article. LIke the shit Marty writes but if a guy puts in a solid effort ill give that person a 3 at least just because its time consuming.
|
|
|
Post by BRB on Dec 30, 2009 22:26:32 GMT -5
Outlawz last article would've very easily been a 4. 3 or 4 would be fine. This is a 3 (that's what I gave it).
No way in hell should a player rankings article be a 4. Doesn't make sense. 2 or 3 should be fine. Prob a 3.
|
|
|
Post by nova on Dec 30, 2009 22:32:07 GMT -5
I'm voting based off what mine got. Shoulda been a 5. Was a 4. Therefore, I'm gonna vote off that scale.
PR's should be a 3, that's what I gave jah's too. a 3.
|
|
|
Post by Outlawz on Dec 30, 2009 22:37:54 GMT -5
Yours was not a 5. Your scale seems bitter. Just saying
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Dec 30, 2009 22:42:36 GMT -5
In between a 2 and a 3 but i gave it a 3
|
|
|
Post by nova on Dec 30, 2009 23:04:05 GMT -5
Yours was not a 5. Your scale seems bitter. Just saying maybe it wasn't, but if mine was only a 4, then in no way is this above a 3, and probably should be a 2.
|
|
|
Post by Outlawz on Dec 30, 2009 23:05:14 GMT -5
never said this wasnt a 3.. i think its a 3
|
|
|
Post by Blue on Dec 31, 2009 0:57:22 GMT -5
lmao fuck you pig
|
|
|
Post by Nanz on Dec 31, 2009 1:27:07 GMT -5
FUCK THAT I OWN thats some bullshit right there.
|
|
|
Post by Nanz on Dec 31, 2009 1:27:36 GMT -5
yeeee lakers all the way that would be so nice
|
|
|
Post by Haberino on Dec 31, 2009 1:28:24 GMT -5
I am fucking terrible at basketball. So out of shape. I love Kayla though so that is nice
|
|