|
Post by Nanz on Nov 29, 2009 14:26:39 GMT -5
"Spence has always let people change their pick if the person following them has yet to pick" Yeah, and it's happened regardless of whether the pick was auto'd or not. That happened countless times in the last BBS. If the person after you hasn't picked, who cares if it was auto'd or not? So the guy who can't be on the boards when his pick is up gets rewarded, but the guy who was on to pick and changes his mind is punished? That makes no sense. Mops was auto'd before his time was up - why shouldn't he be able to make his own pick? Mark MADE HIS PICK. He made his own choice. What if the person after him was ready to pick? We're supposed to hold shit up because Mark want to flip-flop? No. If you want to trade the pick then do so before using it. Simple. STFU you're not involved!!! Go pay off the damn refs!
|
|
Maniac
Senior Member
Ex-GM
Posts: 7,739
|
Post by Maniac on Nov 29, 2009 14:26:48 GMT -5
There's absolutely no fucking logic to one case being allowed and the other being disallowed. At the end of the day, the exact same thing is happening. A pick is being undone and changed. Why should whether or not one guy got auto'd factor into the rule, and if it's going to, how could factor to his advantage? That's pathetic. In both cases, nobody had picked afterwards. In one case, a guy held everyone up and got auto'd, and somehow, this guy is allowed to reverse his pick. The circumstances that make Mark's case different (the trade and him actually making the pick) don't change the fact that nobody had picked afterwards, They actually change nothing at all. Are you just arguing for the sake of arguing?
|
|
|
Post by jahallstar on Nov 29, 2009 14:27:01 GMT -5
I don't think you are that dumb Aaron. I really don't want to believe it. How can you not see it was different?
|
|
|
Post by Haberino on Nov 29, 2009 14:28:13 GMT -5
"Spence has always let people change their pick if the person following them has yet to pick" Yeah, and it's happened regardless of whether the pick was auto'd or not. That happened countless times in the last BBS. If the person after you hasn't picked, who cares if it was auto'd or not? So the guy who can't be on the boards when his pick is up gets rewarded, but the guy who was on to pick and changes his mind is punished? That makes no sense. Mops was auto'd before his time was up - why shouldn't he be able to make his own pick? Mark MADE HIS PICK. He made his own choice. What if the person after him was ready to pick? We're supposed to hold shit up because Mark want to flip-flop? No. If you want to trade the pick then do so before using it. Simple. The point is that the person after him wasn't on to pick. That's the argument. Mark wouldn't have held anything up because the guy picking after him hadn't picked and was not around. He wasn't holding anything up. Mops was the only one who held things up, by leaving when he knew his pick was coming. Simple.
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Nov 29, 2009 14:28:22 GMT -5
LOL
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Nov 29, 2009 14:28:53 GMT -5
Mark MADE the pick
Mops DIDN'T
Mark CHANGED his pick for a trade
it's not even a similar situation
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Nov 29, 2009 14:29:09 GMT -5
And, Mops was auto'd before his time was up
|
|
|
Post by jahallstar on Nov 29, 2009 14:29:26 GMT -5
Fine Aaron..Just for you Spence or I will not auto anyone early even if we are 99.9% sure they will now be here in time. We will make this draft last 4 weeks just for you.
|
|
|
Post by Haberino on Nov 29, 2009 14:29:44 GMT -5
I don't think you are that dumb Aaron. I really don't want to believe it. How can you not see it was different? Jesus, fuck off. Make a point or stop. The only things different about these cases are irrelevant. If the guy after you isn't on to pick, you should be allowed to change the pick. If that's true for one case (especially an auto), it should be true for any.
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Nov 29, 2009 14:30:21 GMT -5
Yeah, I mean, I traded for the pick that was Mark Price AND got the pick right after, so both were in my control, yet I couldn't change the Mark Price pick. So, everything has seemed to follow that...
|
|
|
Post by jahallstar on Nov 29, 2009 14:30:47 GMT -5
I made a point and it was a factual and true point. . Everyone else saw it except for you. Your really not doing any justice to disband any "clique" talk.
|
|
|
Post by jahallstar on Nov 29, 2009 14:31:18 GMT -5
Ashes had the logical common sense to be able to see how it was different!
|
|
|
Post by Haberino on Nov 29, 2009 14:31:44 GMT -5
And, Mops was auto'd before his time was up Yeah...as punishment. I don't see how that plays to his advantage. He fucked up and got punished for it. The cases are completely similar because picks were posted and there was nobody on after them. One was allowed to change, the other wasn't. The fact that Spence picked for Mops and Mark made the pick himself don't explain why one can be allowed to make a change and the other can't. Getting auto'd means you fucked up.
|
|
|
Post by jahallstar on Nov 29, 2009 14:32:43 GMT -5
Spence autoed Mops to try to speed things up. Mops did not pick. Mops did not break the rules.
|
|
Mops
Junior Member
Ex-GM
Posts: 2,267
|
Post by Mops on Nov 29, 2009 14:34:35 GMT -5
Lol
|
|