|
|
Post by Stannis Baratheon on Aug 9, 2012 14:54:49 GMT -5
spennys trying to take down our computers so he doesnt have to run bbs anymore
|
|
|
|
Post by aar on Aug 9, 2012 15:52:22 GMT -5
Does Outlawz even care about being in the Finals?
Hasn't logged on since last night
|
|
|
|
Post by jaycatch on Aug 9, 2012 16:10:20 GMT -5
trying to look at a players profile and this is happening again..  Needs new server or to wipe everything and reupload. Not sure. |
|
|
|
Post by Biggie on Aug 9, 2012 17:21:59 GMT -5
Damn, spencer at work?
|
|
|
|
Post by BRB on Aug 9, 2012 18:26:37 GMT -5
Rule should allow playing someone at SG as long as the SF is SG eligible. That way matching guys up defensively wouldn't be impossible. Not like playing Purvis at SF and Tyler at SG gives me any general advantage, whereas not being able to match guys up defensively is a pretty big disadvantage. When people were complaining about you moving Davis to SG, wasn't your general response "you all can do it" or some bull to that extent? Your matching up against one of the rare teams that can fuck you over with a gimmick. Maybe you should've prepared for it and found a better defensive 2? That said, welcome to the bitchwagon.  Snacks are to the left. Drinks to the right. |
|
|
|
Post by CC on Aug 9, 2012 18:28:02 GMT -5
I work a ton over the next 6 days |
|
|
|
Post by BRB on Aug 9, 2012 18:28:50 GMT -5
I work a ton over the next 6 days  |
|
|
|
Post by Stannis Baratheon on Aug 9, 2012 18:29:38 GMT -5
hes lying
|
|
|
|
Post by repole ಠ_ಠ on Aug 9, 2012 18:38:00 GMT -5
What does my saying "you all can do it" have to do with anything though? The difference here is that when I was doing it there was 0 rule and that people somehow tried to use it to diminish my winning I have absolutely nothing against Outlawz playing Bird at SG because that's the way the rule is. All I'm doing is suggesting a change to the rule that would be more in line with the spirit of the rule. Bird is no more of a SG than Tyler is, a rule that judges your ability to play SG based on the style of offense you play (inside vs outside) doesn't make sense.
My stance has always been fewer rules/restrictions the better. I'm complaining about a restriction, not claiming there should be MORE restrictions. There's a big difference. My objection with the situation is basically that the rule doesn't leave enough wiggle room and results in some corner cases that are unfortunate. If people don't agree than whatever, but don't see how I'm doing anything that somehow contradicts what I've stated before. This is exactly in line with my complaints about when the SG rule was instituted, and really has 0 relation to the whole "anyone can do it" thing. But whatevs.
|
|
|
|
Post by BRB on Aug 9, 2012 18:41:16 GMT -5
My whole point is about bitching, which you kinda proved.
All people do is bitch because of some rule, because someone is gimmicking. or some trade. Outlawz, within the rules in place, out gimmicked you. Deal with it.
|
|
|
|
Post by repole ಠ_ಠ on Aug 9, 2012 18:50:58 GMT -5
People bitch and complain in a sim league. Deal with it.
See how easy that is? The same way you want people not to bitch and complain, I want rules that make sense.
|
|
|
|
Post by BRB on Aug 9, 2012 18:52:58 GMT -5
People bitch and complain in a sim league. Deal with it. See how easy that is? The same way you want people not to bitch and complain, I want rules that make sense.  My bad repole. I'll leave it b |
|
|
|
Post by repole ಠ_ಠ on Aug 9, 2012 18:58:31 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by repole ಠ_ಠ on Aug 9, 2012 19:01:55 GMT -5
what are the odds lawz sent a DC and Spencer will actually be able to sim next time he's on?
|
|
|
|
Post by aar on Aug 9, 2012 19:05:37 GMT -5
what are the odds lawz sent a DC and Spencer will actually be able to sim next time he's on? He'll sim anyhow im sure |
|
