|
|
Post by Juju Erving on Jul 28, 2012 16:05:26 GMT -5
He offered it to Mike Green  I need a freebie oh I get what you're saying. signed Green and lost your cap. Yea that does suck but what did you offer Gilmore anyway? curious |
|
|
|
Post by Juju Erving on Jul 28, 2012 16:06:12 GMT -5
nvm I didn't refresh before I posted... ic. sucks I feel weird about getting Gilmore back now
not to say that it wasn't possible he'd come back still. I've seen weirder
|
|
|
|
Post by Juju Erving on Jul 28, 2012 16:16:43 GMT -5
I may finally get a decent backup point for the first time in years
|
|
|
|
Post by repole ಠ_ಠ on Jul 28, 2012 16:32:35 GMT -5
losing Copeland is like mehhhh, but we'll still win 60+ Need TC to be kind to all these young dudes though. Purvis especially. did you max him? yup. Think I used up any luck I ever had signing Jerry Lucas. I've lost prime Kwan Xi, Glock, and Copeland to lesser contracts now. Meh. |
|
|
|
Post by repole ಠ_ಠ on Jul 28, 2012 16:33:59 GMT -5
This FA fucked me in every way possible really.
Copeland leaves
Celtics prob lose Gilmore if not for Spencer scew up.
Thunder retain Glenn
meh.
|
|
|
|
Post by jaycatch on Jul 28, 2012 16:38:27 GMT -5
I have mj so cool
|
|
|
|
Post by Juju Erving on Jul 28, 2012 16:38:51 GMT -5
this dude said prime Kwan Xi I'm LOLing for real right now
|
|
|
|
Post by styro on Jul 28, 2012 16:57:20 GMT -5
true he did... hopefully MJ loses some points somewhere gonna go from 100 to 99 potential |
|
|
|
Post by repole ಠ_ಠ on Jul 28, 2012 17:03:12 GMT -5
Kwan Xi was a stud for me, and tremendously important to the way my roster was composed. Those teams were built similar to my current team, a bunch of players who served very distinct roles.
|
|
|
|
Post by styro on Jul 28, 2012 17:16:07 GMT -5
this dude said prime Kwan Xi I'm LOLing for real right now |
|
|
|
Post by Stannis Baratheon on Jul 28, 2012 17:22:35 GMT -5
fuck boyssssssss
|
|
|
|
Post by Ab-Soul on Jul 28, 2012 18:01:08 GMT -5
this dude said prime Kwan Xi I'm LOLing for real right now |
|
|
|
Post by repole ಠ_ಠ on Jul 28, 2012 18:25:15 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Juju Erving on Jul 29, 2012 4:56:00 GMT -5
8 Hawks @ Celtics
65 Celtics @ Hawks
94 Celtics @ Hawks
116 Hawks @ Celtics
|
|
|
|
Post by jaycatch on Jul 29, 2012 9:22:27 GMT -5
8 Hawks @ Celtics 65 Celtics @ Hawks 94 Celtics @ Hawks 116 Hawks @ Celtics Celtics are much better, nothing to anticipate. |
|
