|
|
Post by Play on Jun 12, 2012 16:46:52 GMT -5
this is a pretty good FA
|
|
|
|
Post by repole ಠ_ಠ on Jun 12, 2012 17:02:17 GMT -5
lol @ leaving Hawkins out So it was a conscious decision on my part, but I had 0 idea people would be treating him as a MAX. I was going to put him in my sleeper section, but figured I'd save him for myself  . Little did I know he's apparently MAX worthy. Looks like Quinn Barnes part 2 to me, and nobody (other than maybe me) would have MAXd Barnes back in the day. |
|
|
|
Post by repole ಠ_ಠ on Jun 12, 2012 17:03:21 GMT -5
TBH I thought the first person who mentioned MAXing Hawkins was trolling.
|
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Jun 12, 2012 18:11:26 GMT -5
lol @ leaving Hawkins out So it was a conscious decision on my part, but I had 0 idea people would be treating him as a MAX. I was going to put him in my sleeper section, but figured I'd save him for myself . Little did I know he's apparently MAX worthy. Looks like Quinn Barnes part 2 to me, and nobody (other than maybe me) would have MAXd Barnes back in the day. except had you looked in the RC thread you would note he started with 85+ inside to go with that A+ outside |
|
|
|
Post by BRB on Jun 12, 2012 18:18:48 GMT -5
TBH I thought the first person who mentioned MAXing Hawkins was trolling. Are you suggesting that GM's would dare prop up someone's value on the board? |
|
|
|
Post by repole ಠ_ಠ on Jun 12, 2012 18:20:00 GMT -5
So it was a conscious decision on my part, but I had 0 idea people would be treating him as a MAX. I was going to put him in my sleeper section, but figured I'd save him for myself . Little did I know he's apparently MAX worthy. Looks like Quinn Barnes part 2 to me, and nobody (other than maybe me) would have MAXd Barnes back in the day. except had you looked in the RC thread you would note he started with 85+ inside to go with that A+ outside Meh, Roger Strickland had high inside, midrange, outside, and he was never a volume guy even as an option. Quickness is really important, as is strength. |
|
|
|
Post by BRB on Jun 12, 2012 18:22:06 GMT -5
I'm maxing his ass to add to the young talent on roster. I have two more seasons before my CY. I'm fine with working shit out until then.
|
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Jun 12, 2012 18:22:23 GMT -5
except had you looked in the RC thread you would note he started with 85+ inside to go with that A+ outside Meh, Roger Strickland had high inside, midrange, outside, and he was never a volume guy even as an option. Quickness is really important, as is strength. Strick was ridiculously slow yeah, Hawkins isnt |
|
|
|
Post by repole ಠ_ಠ on Jun 12, 2012 18:24:07 GMT -5
I thought Strick was fast but weak? That was my perception if I remember right, or at some point I made that assumption based on his defense rating changes.
|
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Jun 12, 2012 18:25:42 GMT -5
He was slow as hell as I recall
|
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Jun 12, 2012 18:27:13 GMT -5
Roger Strickland SF 6'5'' 200 22 C A D C C B is a big time scorer. He isnt very athletic, but he can score inside and out. His range is unreal. If that offense wasnt enough Strickland can also get steals and is a decent rebounder as well. handle issues? or just low passing/quickness Doesnt pass. Not very athletic. |
|
|
|
Post by repole ಠ_ಠ on Jun 12, 2012 18:30:07 GMT -5
I'd of bet his quickness was in the 50s, maybe 60s. Which isn't great, but it wasn't off the charts horrible.
I think his strength was off the charts horrible.
|
|
|
|
Post by repole ಠ_ಠ on Jun 12, 2012 18:30:31 GMT -5
I tried to recreate him a few times in FBB, and the only way I got similar results was with really low strength
|
|
|
|
Post by Haberino on Jun 12, 2012 19:04:24 GMT -5
He left out jvbk intentionally too
|
|
|
|
Post by Martinez on Jun 12, 2012 19:11:49 GMT -5
no one asked for your commentary
|
|
. Little did I know he's apparently MAX worthy. Looks like Quinn Barnes part 2 to me, and nobody (other than maybe me) would have MAXd Barnes back in the day.
