|
Post by Ab-Soul on Jun 6, 2012 23:10:39 GMT -5
i'd take dawkins over tyler.
|
|
|
Post by greeme on Jun 6, 2012 23:34:47 GMT -5
that's not lol-worthy at all Lol Get rid of him now when his perceived value is high
|
|
|
Post by Blue on Jun 6, 2012 23:39:46 GMT -5
i have no probably keeping him...
|
|
|
Post by Blue on Jun 6, 2012 23:40:15 GMT -5
his only 'deficiency' is his rebounding, which will be AC'd when I get a chance
|
|
|
Post by Blue on Jun 6, 2012 23:42:03 GMT -5
and even if he doesn't become a star, Tyler will always have value.
|
|
|
Post by greeme on Jun 6, 2012 23:46:42 GMT -5
his only 'deficiency' is his rebounding, which will be AC'd when I get a chance also fg% ft% and shooting propensity or to put it the other way the only thing he is above average at is defense (probably both stat and pos)
|
|
|
Post by greeme on Jun 6, 2012 23:51:01 GMT -5
and even if he doesn't become a star, Tyler will always have value. true but not a ton good defender that blocks avg rebounder bad %s has value no doubt but not a ton
|
|
|
Post by Play on Jun 9, 2012 11:01:47 GMT -5
meh, seems like Tyler and you two picks back would be a very fair offer not a fair offer at all...Styro picks will still be shit....Tyler is a "decent" prospect but I feel he won't improve from his current ratings at all.
|
|
|
Post by styro on Jun 9, 2012 11:02:11 GMT -5
I'd take Tyler over all of those guys honestly, you're a fucking garbage gm so your opinion holds no water.
|
|
|
Post by Play on Jun 9, 2012 11:03:31 GMT -5
that's not lol-worthy at all Lol Get rid of him now when his perceived value is high word
|
|
|
Post by aar on Jun 9, 2012 11:08:55 GMT -5
Lanier
|
|