|
|
Post by brophdog88 on May 27, 2012 13:39:13 GMT -5
I mean I'd keep Dawkins and AC him, sure, but Philly doesn't have the luxury of time right now, and Block is an excellent player. Dawkins is flawed almost everywhere, but he has two promising abilities. He's the more valuable piece, sure, but that's missing the point of the question. Dawikins blocks shots, and is shooting 47.6% from the field as a 19 year old, he needs rebounding sure, and his jump shot, but, if he has potential left, he is worth a ton more than Block, who while no doubt is nice is also 32 and doesnt block shots Dawkins needs to be played at SF right now |
|
|
|
Post by aar on May 27, 2012 13:57:37 GMT -5
I agree. Dawkins for Block is laughable.
He would be fired on the spot if that happened.
|
|
|
|
Post by Haberino on May 27, 2012 14:34:42 GMT -5
Aar is it like your thing to take extreme stances? You're constantly unreasonable
|
|
|
|
Post by Haberino on May 27, 2012 15:43:40 GMT -5
I mean I'd keep Dawkins and AC him, sure, but Philly doesn't have the luxury of time right now, and Block is an excellent player. Dawkins is flawed almost everywhere, but he has two promising abilities. He's the more valuable piece, sure, but that's missing the point of the question. Dawikins blocks shots, and is shooting 47.6% from the field as a 19 year old, he needs rebounding sure, and his jump shot, but, if he has potential left, he is worth a ton more than Block, who while no doubt is nice is also 32 and doesnt block shots Dawkins needs to be played at SF right now holy shit do you read. |
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on May 27, 2012 20:07:38 GMT -5
Dawikins blocks shots, and is shooting 47.6% from the field as a 19 year old, he needs rebounding sure, and his jump shot, but, if he has potential left, he is worth a ton more than Block, who while no doubt is nice is also 32 and doesnt block shots Dawkins needs to be played at SF right now holy shit do you read. sure, I read the part where you said Dawkins is horrible, but he really isnt, he is 19 and not shooting horrid percentages from the field, thats a big deal |
|
|
|
Post by Haberino on May 27, 2012 20:19:16 GMT -5
was referring to you saying "he is worth a ton more than block" while quoting a post saying the value comparison isnt the point of the question
|
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on May 27, 2012 22:55:05 GMT -5
was referring to you saying "he is worth a ton more than block" while quoting a post saying the value comparison isnt the point of the question yeah but he could get far better value than that and still improve his team, so regardless of the offer it would be dumb...Gene Moore would be a better deal than that |
|
|
|
Post by Martinez on May 29, 2012 10:41:40 GMT -5
call better GMs out
lose in 1st round to CC
|
|
|
|
Post by jaycatch on May 29, 2012 11:00:29 GMT -5
8. Finish this sentence. When it's all said and done, George McGinniss will be a player wasted in his prime due to J's reluctance to trade him during his prime and J's reluctance to put anything great around him. The same McGinnis who has been on the trade block all year? Oh. |
|
|
|
Post by greeme on May 29, 2012 11:03:37 GMT -5
8. Finish this sentence. When it's all said and done, George McGinniss will be a player wasted in his prime due to J's reluctance to trade him during his prime and J's reluctance to put anything great around him. The same McGinnis who has been on the trade block all year? Oh. Nuggets like Answer my pm |
|
