|
|
Post by brophdog88 on May 21, 2012 20:34:31 GMT -5
Styro just thinks anything I do is being a pompous asshole, obviously I cant try to put effort into an article without it just being another sign of me being a pompous asshole
|
|
|
|
Post by repole ಠ_ಠ on May 21, 2012 20:41:51 GMT -5
Good stuff Why is getting rid of volume scorers to make a great scorer shoot more a bad idea, exactly? I did this in the past by the way, starting guys like Bill Smith and Temple Tucker, Cory Laifer, Mo Stokes, etc. That's how I built my team around Omar Green, no different than Bingo in that regard. Goal is always to get the most efficient scorer the most shots. Mel Daniels also wasn't a bad move. I gave up three late firsts that didn't have value for a guy who's consistently given me blocks, rebounds, low turnovers, and hasn't hurt me offensively. yeah but not all players can handle that volume, not to mention its putting the onus all on Bingo and kills you if he gets hurt Well obviously not all players, but I think you could get 35+ out of JoJo or Issel in the right situation. From the Bobcats perspective, if moving Frazier for NVL meant a few more shots for Issel, that'd be worth it (that isn't something I've offered or am interested in, just an example). And if anyone loses their best player they're fucked, so it doesn't really matter. I think if we swapped Bobby and Bingo I'd still win 60+, though I'd have to make a sidemove and swing Lamar for an offensive big (Owens maybe?) so that his inefficient ass doesn't take more shots. Then again, Bobby's one of the 5 most valuable players in the league to me, I'd take him over damned near anyone not named Bingo. |
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on May 21, 2012 20:46:51 GMT -5
yeah but not all players can handle that volume, not to mention its putting the onus all on Bingo and kills you if he gets hurt Well obviously not all players, but I think you could get 35+ out of JoJo or Issel in the right situation. From the Bobcats perspective, if moving Frazier for NVL meant a few more shots for Issel, that'd be worth it (that isn't something I've offered or am interested in, just an example). And if anyone loses their best player they're fucked, so it doesn't really matter. I think if we swapped Bobby and Bingo I'd still win 60+, though I'd have to make a sidemove and swing Lamar for an offensive big (Owens maybe?) so that his inefficient ass doesn't take more shots. Then again, Bobby's one of the 5 most valuable players in the league to me, I'd take him over damned near anyone not named Bingo. ehh, see we differ there I guess, I dont want a team reliant on just one guy, yeah, the Bobcats would take a hit if they lost Issel for an extended period of time, but they still have three other gguys they can turn to for scoring with him out, you have Willie, and thats fiine, but thats because you have Bingo. Bingo is like the best scoring and best defensive SG and PF's rolled together, you get 2 players worth of production outta just him, meaning that other player is just a bonus, Without him you are still a top 2 GM (and recently the best), but unlike the current trends you arent untouchable |
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on May 21, 2012 20:48:49 GMT -5
For all Gerald Wallaces ability, he never actually won a title until he was 39 and a bench warmer, in part because he never got the team around him, but, lets not forget he was also an inside scoring oriented player, he didnt have the three point shot, and as such he wasnt the insanely efficient offensive player that Bingo is, people thought G Wall was god, but I dont even know what that makes Bingo
|
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on May 21, 2012 21:29:15 GMT -5
2 more
|
|
|
|
Post by ukfanjohn on May 21, 2012 21:34:41 GMT -5
Meh sucks this team won't get past Orlando.
|
|
|
|
Post by ukfanjohn on May 21, 2012 21:35:28 GMT -5
Guess I should tweak my DC some more, we went 3-2 in part 2 of the playoffs with Thurmond at PF in the playoffs after going like 3-5 against the raps the rest of the season
|
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on May 21, 2012 21:46:53 GMT -5
one more please
|
|
|
|
Post by repole ಠ_ಠ on May 21, 2012 22:26:34 GMT -5
Well obviously not all players, but I think you could get 35+ out of JoJo or Issel in the right situation. From the Bobcats perspective, if moving Frazier for NVL meant a few more shots for Issel, that'd be worth it (that isn't something I've offered or am interested in, just an example). And if anyone loses their best player they're fucked, so it doesn't really matter. I think if we swapped Bobby and Bingo I'd still win 60+, though I'd have to make a sidemove and swing Lamar for an offensive big (Owens maybe?) so that his inefficient ass doesn't take more shots. Then again, Bobby's one of the 5 most valuable players in the league to me, I'd take him over damned near anyone not named Bingo. ehh, see we differ there I guess, I dont want a team reliant on just one guy, yeah, the Bobcats would take a hit if they lost Issel for an extended period of time, but they still have three other gguys they can turn to for scoring with him out, you have Willie, and thats fiine, but thats because you have Bingo. Bingo is like the best scoring and best defensive SG and PF's rolled together, you get 2 players worth of production outta just him, meaning that other player is just a bonus, Without him you are still a top 2 GM (and recently the best), but unlike the current trends you arent untouchable We'd still be above average if Bingo went down, Clemens would step in and pick up a big chunk of scoring, and NVL would see some more touches. I missed out on GWall's career unfortunately  |
|
|
|
Post by CC on May 21, 2012 22:27:09 GMT -5
|
|
