|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Apr 29, 2012 20:18:29 GMT -5
14. Would you send Kermit Washington for Elvin Hayes? Hayes is such a sick player but his numbers were down this year… 43% shooting this year is eh. Best case scenario for Kermit is turning out like Hayes but my team is still so young I don’t really see the need to trade for him. HF pm’d me a few weeks ago about making a deal like this but I wasn’t ready to do it then and I don’t think I would do it now. I want to see what Kermit can become alongside Carr and Rudy mainly because I can afford to do so. Kermit Washington C 23 6'8'' 230 A- C- C A+ B+ A That is just so sexy says everything, jesus |
|
|
|
Post by styro on Apr 29, 2012 20:24:15 GMT -5
lmaooooo
|
|
|
|
Post by styro on Apr 29, 2012 20:24:33 GMT -5
how you gonna reject trading a dude straight up when you say that's his best case scenario
|
|
|
|
Post by Haberino on Apr 29, 2012 20:26:16 GMT -5
how you gonna reject trading a dude straight up when you say that's his best case scenario some pretty crude cost benefit analysis says youre employing some awful logic over there george |
|
|
|
Post by styro on Apr 29, 2012 20:28:14 GMT -5
well, it's objective analysis.
|
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Apr 29, 2012 20:29:49 GMT -5
umm, no, if a guys best case scenario is a player in the league "offered" to you, you are pretty much saying
Pros:
He is as good as Kermit will be
Hes a stud, the kind my team could use right now without its pick at 39-43
clearly something isnt right
Locked up, so I wont have to worry about resigning all my young guys together
takes all the risk of a poor TC for a guy whose upside wasnt a stud.
Cons:
Well, Kermit is cheaper now
In the event Kermit does become Hayes like, I mean, he meshes age wise with my guys
|
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Apr 29, 2012 20:30:29 GMT -5
the advantages of trading a younger Kermit for the older Hayes far far far outweigh the negatives
|
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Apr 29, 2012 20:31:23 GMT -5
how many times does a dynasty young team ever work out? I cant really think of any that have here, you have to trade guys for improvements
|
|
|
|
Post by Nanz on Apr 29, 2012 20:37:19 GMT -5
Sounds like I nailed it lol
|
|
|
|
Post by Ab-Soul on Apr 29, 2012 20:40:20 GMT -5
i wouldn't take kermit for hayes what the fuck
|
|
|
|
Post by Haberino on Apr 29, 2012 20:40:34 GMT -5
umm, no, if a guys best case scenario is a player in the league "offered" to you, you are pretty much saying Pros: He is as good as Kermit will be Hes a stud, the kind my team could use right now without its pick at 39-43 clearly something isnt right Locked up, so I wont have to worry about resigning all my young guys together takes all the risk of a poor TC for a guy whose upside wasnt a stud. Cons: Well, Kermit is cheaper now In the event Kermit does become Hayes like, I mean, he meshes age wise with my guys it's not a kermit-hayes specific point, and i'd think you might want to add things like value and window to the list of cons. you know, because those are fucking massive factors. like, if you could have 90% of the player hayes is, costing you anywhere between 1/8 and at most 2/3 what hayes cost, with no risk of decline and five more years of performance, you wouldn't stop your analysis at whether the player's best case scenario is hayes |
|
|
|
Post by Nanz on Apr 29, 2012 20:41:22 GMT -5
Lol nobody said you would
|
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Apr 29, 2012 20:45:23 GMT -5
umm, no, if a guys best case scenario is a player in the league "offered" to you, you are pretty much saying Pros: He is as good as Kermit will be Hes a stud, the kind my team could use right now without its pick at 39-43 clearly something isnt right Locked up, so I wont have to worry about resigning all my young guys together takes all the risk of a poor TC for a guy whose upside wasnt a stud. Cons: Well, Kermit is cheaper now In the event Kermit does become Hayes like, I mean, he meshes age wise with my guys it's not a kermit-hayes specific point, and i'd think you might want to add things like value and window to the list of cons. you know, because those are fucking massive factors. like, if you could have 90% of the player hayes is, costing you anywhere between 1/8 and at most 2/3 what hayes cost, with no risk of decline and five more years of performance, you wouldn't stop your analysis at whether the player's best case scenario is hayes except in what, two years, Kermit is going to cost a max in all likelihood or be gone, he isnt near the player Hayes is right now....and as for Window that doesnt change at all, well, it moves it up. |
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Apr 29, 2012 20:47:15 GMT -5
and I laugh at the no risk of decline for Kermit, its very possible he is at or near his peak...Spencer starts guys with 100/90/85, with his notes, odds are extremely high Kermit started with 85, which means his potential is around a 70 right now
|
|
|
|
Post by Haberino on Apr 29, 2012 20:48:42 GMT -5
it's not a kermit-hayes specific point, and i'd think you might want to add things like value and window to the list of cons. you know, because those are fucking massive factors. like, if you could have 90% of the player hayes is, costing you anywhere between 1/8 and at most 2/3 what hayes cost, with no risk of decline and five more years of performance, you wouldn't stop your analysis at whether the player's best case scenario is hayes except in what, two years, Kermit is going to cost a max in all likelihood or be gone, he isnt near the player Hayes is right now....and as for Window that doesnt change at all, well, it moves it up. except something i accounted for? ok, lololol |
|
