|
Post by brophdog88 on Mar 19, 2012 0:17:22 GMT -5
Stop proving me wrong. Don't see any difference between Glock and Bing for what it's worth. Assists don't mean anything. Willie's STL/TO advantage is negated by his lack of rebounding. I went and made everyteam completely identical, except one team every player had 100 passing, the other every team had 5 (the other 27 every player had 50)....the 5 had the better record in each of my first three attempts, though the offense was worse from the field in the first two, they committed 1 turnover less than every other team
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Mar 19, 2012 0:18:05 GMT -5
I felt like my other players played better with Wilt's passing in the post, but really it was just having 4 scorers..
|
|
|
Post by repole ಠ_ಠ on Mar 19, 2012 0:20:42 GMT -5
Stop proving me wrong. Don't see any difference between Glock and Bing for what it's worth. Assists don't mean anything. Willie's STL/TO advantage is negated by his lack of rebounding. Bing gained .1 possesion, Glock lost .6 That's worth about .7 points per game. Glock's TS% was 60.4 Bing's was 58.0 The difference over 21 shots (about what Glock took per game) is 1 point. Advantage Glock
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Mar 19, 2012 0:20:58 GMT -5
funny part is neither team was better than every other team, typically at least two or three of the 50's won 50
|
|
|
Post by styro on Mar 19, 2012 0:21:20 GMT -5
damn. advanced stats have really shat all over everything.
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Mar 19, 2012 0:22:49 GMT -5
Bing gained .1 possesion, Glock lost .6 That's worth about .7 points per game. Glock's TS% was 60.4 Bing's was 58.0 The difference over 21 shots (about what Glock took per game) is 1 point. Advantage Glock and yet Bing still scored more overall...Glock wasnt shooting for volume last year for god knows what reason, but they guy scoring 2 more points a game with similar all around otherwise gets the win for me
|
|
|
Post by repole ಠ_ಠ on Mar 19, 2012 0:24:25 GMT -5
He scored 2.6 more points in 5.2 more minutes.
That's actually a lower scoring rate.
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Mar 19, 2012 0:26:18 GMT -5
He scored 2.6 more points in 5.2 more minutes. That's actually a lower scoring rate. yes but FBB tends to players it thinks are better more, so that cant be held against Bing...Glock doesnt play that much, ever, not due to DC
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Mar 19, 2012 0:26:42 GMT -5
I mean, I would rather have that guy out there those extra 5.2 minutes than whoever my backup is
|
|
|
Post by repole ಠ_ಠ on Mar 19, 2012 0:27:23 GMT -5
Erm, I have no idea what you're arguing, but if I'd put Glock as my backup SG as I should have, he'd of played more minutes and scored as much as Bing.
Who cares who FBB thinks is better?
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Mar 19, 2012 0:29:04 GMT -5
Erm, I have no idea what you're arguing, but if I'd put Glock as my backup SG as I should have, he'd of played more minutes and scored as much as Bing. Who cares who FBB thinks is better? was Bing backup SG? no...you would have to fiddle with your DC to get those extra minutes. Do you want a big that only plays 28 minutes or the guy that does 34? its FBB, Bing playing extra is an advantage, and one that holds up over the past years
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Mar 19, 2012 0:30:26 GMT -5
also, scoring plateau's some, so to take those minutes and say 2.6 in 5.2 isnt really correct
|
|
|
Post by repole ಠ_ಠ on Mar 19, 2012 0:32:27 GMT -5
Who cares if I have to fiddle with my DC to get Glock extra minutes? Pretty much impossible to get guys over 40 minutes a game, what's the difference?
This is such a useless argument it's ridiculous.
|
|
|
Post by repole ಠ_ಠ on Mar 19, 2012 1:39:10 GMT -5
bump, looking for some big man depth, could use some help on the glass
|
|
|
Post by repole ಠ_ಠ on Mar 19, 2012 14:10:51 GMT -5
do ittt
|
|