|
Post by Play on Feb 29, 2012 14:48:35 GMT -5
easy 5...its a new idea and research is a bitch...Also, we have lacked articles around here lately.
|
|
|
Post by Pig on Feb 29, 2012 14:48:56 GMT -5
I work on the 5 for pretty much everything type deal.
|
|
|
Post by Pig on Feb 29, 2012 14:49:57 GMT -5
easy 5...its a new idea and research is a bitch...Also, we have lacked articles around here lately. This. Y'all bitching about giving this article a 5 can go write your own articles and then we can talk.
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Feb 29, 2012 14:50:00 GMT -5
I dont feel it has the substance to deserve two fives...thats the issue, hes asking for a +10 for what really isnt all that much...one article this is far and away a five, but, put this into one article and the content isnt there for a +10
|
|
|
Post by GAME on Feb 29, 2012 14:50:50 GMT -5
easy 5...its a new idea and research is a bitch...Also, we have lacked articles around here lately. This. Y'all bitching about giving this article a 5 can go write your own articles and then we can talk.
|
|
|
Post by Martinez on Feb 29, 2012 14:51:47 GMT -5
5 for sure idiotic people give this 4s and 3s.
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Feb 29, 2012 14:52:17 GMT -5
seems like there shoulda been a bigger writeup on the best teams, or why he thought they were better, or really anything...but he just puts the team in order and talks about them...not them in reference to the others in anyway
|
|
|
Post by aar on Feb 29, 2012 14:56:38 GMT -5
I work on the 5 for pretty much everything type deal. Me too If you take the time to write something in-depth, you should be rewarded
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Feb 29, 2012 14:57:34 GMT -5
I work on the 5 for pretty much everything type deal. Me too If you take the time to write something in-depth, you should be rewarded this isnt in depth at all, you barely scratched the surface
|
|
|
Post by styro on Feb 29, 2012 15:02:56 GMT -5
4 is a reward...
|
|
|
Post by Pig on Feb 29, 2012 15:04:00 GMT -5
Sounds like we might have an article off pretty soon.
|
|
|
Post by Juju Erving on Feb 29, 2012 15:28:23 GMT -5
meh.. no love for teams that were put together kinda late and suffered record wise because of it? I think my 20 squad was better than a # of teams up here.
323 George Hall C 26 7'1'' 290 A- F D+ A- A- B 323 George Hall C 74 34.0 14.5 12.4 2.2 1.3 3.4 1.0 .465 .378 .000
274 Sean O'Mara C 24 7'1'' 314 B+ C- D+ B A- C 274 Sean O'Mara C 77 34.7 21.6 12.8 2.2 0.9 3.6 1.6 .464 .728 .000
414 LeBron James SF 35 6'9'' 243 A A B+ B- B- D 414 LeBron James SF 65 36.0 27.6 8.7 4.8 1.7 1.3 2.5 .490 .864 .428
383 Alan Trobow SF 23 6'9'' 236 B+ A- C- C+ B B 383 Alan Trobow SF 78 29.2 13.3 7.7 1.5 0.7 0.3 1.1 .442 .802 .415
335 Mitchell Jordan SG 25 6'6'' 226 A- A- C B- C- B 335 Mitchell Jordan SG 82 38.3 22.2 5.2 2.3 1.5 1.3 1.3 .471 .788 .344
553 John Wall PG 30 6'4'' 198 A- A A A+ C+ C 553 John Wall PG 69 38.8 25.0 6.5 11.3 2.2 0.2 3.0 .509 .786 .471
|
|
|
Post by Juju Erving on Feb 29, 2012 15:29:03 GMT -5
I'm a tough grader but I gave both 5s.. good to see articles again
|
|
|
Post by aar on Feb 29, 2012 15:33:59 GMT -5
meh.. no love for teams that were put together kinda late and suffered record wise because of it? I think my 20 squad was better than a # of teams up here. 323 George Hall C 26 7'1'' 290 A- F D+ A- A- B 323 George Hall C 74 34.0 14.5 12.4 2.2 1.3 3.4 1.0 .465 .378 .000 274 Sean O'Mara C 24 7'1'' 314 B+ C- D+ B A- C 274 Sean O'Mara C 77 34.7 21.6 12.8 2.2 0.9 3.6 1.6 .464 .728 .000 414 LeBron James SF 35 6'9'' 243 A A B+ B- B- D 414 LeBron James SF 65 36.0 27.6 8.7 4.8 1.7 1.3 2.5 .490 .864 .428 383 Alan Trobow SF 23 6'9'' 236 B+ A- C- C+ B B 383 Alan Trobow SF 78 29.2 13.3 7.7 1.5 0.7 0.3 1.1 .442 .802 .415 335 Mitchell Jordan SG 25 6'6'' 226 A- A- C B- C- B 335 Mitchell Jordan SG 82 38.3 22.2 5.2 2.3 1.5 1.3 1.3 .471 .788 .344 553 John Wall PG 30 6'4'' 198 A- A A A+ C+ C 553 John Wall PG 69 38.8 25.0 6.5 11.3 2.2 0.2 3.0 .509 .786 .471 That's a solid squad I loved George Hall
|
|
|
Post by Stannis Baratheon on Feb 29, 2012 19:21:27 GMT -5
|
|