|
Post by brophdog88 on Jan 3, 2012 20:59:33 GMT -5
as Love might be the best inside scorer in the league.
you didnt
|
|
|
Post by Haberino on Jan 3, 2012 21:01:43 GMT -5
to my eyes there's one inside scorer who's more efficient.
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Jan 3, 2012 21:03:40 GMT -5
631 Nate Thurmond C 31 35.0 25.1 12.5 2.6 0.7 3.5 1.3 .486 .827 .000 298 Jim Davis SF 37 37.8 25.8 9.0 2.9 1.2 0.4 2.2 .506 .809 .000 203 Johnny Green SF 30 34.8 25.7 9.9 2.3 1.2 0.7 1.2 .517 .685 .154 649 Jerry Lucas PF 34 38.2 24.3 13.2 4.2 0.9 3.5 2.1 .498 .832 .000
gimme those dudes for pure inside scoring
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Jan 3, 2012 21:04:35 GMT -5
to my eyes there's one inside scorer who's more efficient. except Love's jump shot puts him far far higher on the efficiency...and thats not inside scoring, obviously inside shots are far less efficient in FBB than jumpers and 3s, see most Bigs shooting 47% for proof of that
|
|
|
Post by Haberino on Jan 3, 2012 21:05:05 GMT -5
631 Nate Thurmond C 31 35.0 25.1 12.5 2.6 0.7 3.5 1.3 .486 .827 .000 298 Jim Davis SF 37 37.8 25.8 9.0 2.9 1.2 0.4 2.2 .506 .809 .000 203 Johnny Green SF 30 34.8 25.7 9.9 2.3 1.2 0.7 1.2 .517 .685 .154 649 Jerry Lucas PF 34 38.2 24.3 13.2 4.2 0.9 3.5 2.1 .498 .832 .000 gimme those dudes for pure inside scoring why? lol. love as a scorer is outperforming everyone but green
|
|
|
Post by Haberino on Jan 3, 2012 21:05:37 GMT -5
to my eyes there's one inside scorer who's more efficient. except Love's jump shot puts him far far higher on the efficiency...and thats not inside scoring, obviously inside shots are far less efficient in FBB than jumpers and 3s, see most Bigs shooting 47% for proof of that those guys all have high midrange too. wtf. not like i'm not playing an inside offense, and getting to the line is a huge part of inside scoring
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Jan 3, 2012 21:07:05 GMT -5
nobody is beating the Magic this year, team is fucking nuts...wow
|
|
|
Post by Haberino on Jan 3, 2012 21:07:48 GMT -5
wtf was the deal skillz made with repole
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Jan 3, 2012 21:08:10 GMT -5
except Love's jump shot puts him far far higher on the efficiency...and thats not inside scoring, obviously inside shots are far less efficient in FBB than jumpers and 3s, see most Bigs shooting 47% for proof of that those guys all have high midrange too. wtf. not like i'm not playing an inside offense, and getting to the line is a huge part of inside scoring but none are as good as Loves 87.5% Hell, McGlock might be a better inside scorer... either way, Johnny Green is still>>>>> and Jim Davis also goes better as a pure inside guy, just cause of similar numbers but a worse jump shot
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Jan 3, 2012 21:08:58 GMT -5
wtf was the deal skillz made with repole I remember Roger Stickland and Gail Goodrich for Petit and Johnny, then Goodrich for Chubin (mighta been a few picks too)
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Jan 3, 2012 21:09:42 GMT -5
I would be seriously pissed none of my dudes are in the top 45...if I had anybody even worth top 80
|
|
|
Post by Haberino on Jan 3, 2012 21:10:45 GMT -5
those guys all have high midrange too. wtf. not like i'm not playing an inside offense, and getting to the line is a huge part of inside scoring but none are as good as Loves 87.5% Hell, McGlock might be a better inside scorer... either way, Johnny Green is still>>>>> and Jim Davis also goes better as a pure inside guy, just cause of similar numbers but a worse jump shot jim's turnovers level it out though true about my boy glock
|
|
|
Post by Juju Erving on Jan 3, 2012 21:13:22 GMT -5
39. Phil Jackson 28. Levern Tart
solid
|
|
|
Post by Blue on Jan 3, 2012 21:13:54 GMT -5
Wouldn't trade TVA for a couple of the ho's ahead of him, but happy to see his name on here
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Jan 3, 2012 21:16:55 GMT -5
Id take TVA ahead of Love, especially as it pertains to value, as the outside shot both he, and even Mullins Barnett provide make it easier to find a suitor, since your offense is much more flexible with them
|
|