|
|
Post by Haberino on Oct 24, 2011 15:00:42 GMT -5
<-- gassy
|
|
|
|
Post by greeme on Oct 24, 2011 15:02:00 GMT -5
ill easily take Boozer over 15-17.. Ho>>boozer |
|
|
|
Post by Play on Oct 24, 2011 15:02:56 GMT -5
Chet should be higher
|
|
|
|
Post by Martinez on Oct 24, 2011 15:03:24 GMT -5
ill easily take Boozer over 15-17.. well no shit he's a position you need |
|
|
|
Post by Stannis Baratheon on Oct 24, 2011 15:03:25 GMT -5
aim
|
|
|
|
Post by Play on Oct 24, 2011 15:03:50 GMT -5
I mean, you obviously put RC's and maybe AC's into so that's probably why he went +8
|
|
|
|
Post by Play on Oct 24, 2011 15:04:09 GMT -5
ill easily take Boozer over 15-17.. well no shit he's a position you need lmao at position I need fucking hilarious |
|
|
|
Post by Play on Oct 24, 2011 15:07:25 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Juju Erving on Oct 24, 2011 15:09:47 GMT -5
I only skimmed through the lists but they seem alright. nice job
|
|
|
|
Post by Ab-Soul on Oct 24, 2011 15:12:09 GMT -5
lulz, pretty sure not many guys have scored 64 in a game.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ab-Soul on Oct 24, 2011 15:12:18 GMT -5
Boozer>>>> and he can block now.
|
|
|
|
Post by Martinez on Oct 24, 2011 15:17:19 GMT -5
Charlotte Bobcats 8 17 .320 4-6 5-8 13.0
|
|
|
|
Post by CC on Oct 24, 2011 15:18:42 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Haberino on Oct 24, 2011 15:19:07 GMT -5
all the best GMs determine value by looking at a guy's highest scoring game
|
|
|
|
Post by Ab-Soul on Oct 24, 2011 15:19:10 GMT -5
weird.
never said my team was good.
Boozer is just a gawd.
|
|
