|
|
Post by Akomplice on Sept 17, 2011 18:53:03 GMT -5
Bizarre that he'd take the guy over havilecek? Thats fucking stupid Ah so you insinuated that, now it makes sense. |
|
|
|
Post by Jordan on Sept 17, 2011 20:38:00 GMT -5
I don't buy Havlicek is the clear cut as I'm sure there are some that would take Bellamy over him. lol |
|
|
|
Post by Akomplice on Sept 17, 2011 20:45:10 GMT -5
I'll take What is a proposal that some might prefer a stud big man over a stud wing for a 1000 Alex.
|
|
|
|
Post by Haberino on Sept 17, 2011 21:15:56 GMT -5
Bizarre that he'd take the guy over havilecek? Thats fucking stupid no, bizarre that youre making such a big deal out of it. it's big man who will probably be the third most valuable young big in the league from day one. he has nice ratings, really promising notes (his strength+inside notes make them seem incredible), and a big is clearly more valuable than a wing. it's not at all a big deal. |
|
|
|
Post by Jordan on Sept 17, 2011 22:04:56 GMT -5
I'll take What is a proposal that some might prefer a stud big man over a stud wing for a 1000 Alex. last time i laughed that hard i fell off my dinosaur |
|
|
|
Post by Jordan on Sept 17, 2011 22:13:53 GMT -5
Bizarre that he'd take the guy over havilecek? Thats fucking stupid no, bizarre that youre making such a big deal out of it. it's big man who will probably be the third most valuable young big in the league from day one. he has nice ratings, really promising notes (his strength+inside notes make them seem incredible), and a big is clearly more valuable than a wing. it's not at all a big deal. this coming from the guy who took a wing over a big last draft in the 1-2 debate |
|
|
|
Post by Jordan on Sept 17, 2011 22:15:18 GMT -5
and i know it is a different draft with different players but i basically feel the same way you did last year aaron. I prefer the wing significantly more
|
|
|
|
Post by Haberino on Sept 17, 2011 22:25:38 GMT -5
no, bizarre that youre making such a big deal out of it. it's big man who will probably be the third most valuable young big in the league from day one. he has nice ratings, really promising notes (his strength+inside notes make them seem incredible), and a big is clearly more valuable than a wing. it's not at all a big deal. this coming from the guy who took a wing over a big last draft in the 1-2 debate i went BPA because i was at square one and didn't see lucas as a franchise piece. that doesn't mean that i'd go BPA in every situation where it's a wing or a big. the fact that bigs are more valuable than wings is a passable justification for taking the number two prospect over the top guy. anyway, even if it's the wrong move, you're still overreacting. |
|
|
|
Post by Jordan on Sept 17, 2011 22:26:33 GMT -5
isn't that what we do in bbs? overreact
|
|
|
|
Post by Haberino on Sept 17, 2011 22:27:42 GMT -5
and i know it is a different draft with different players but i basically feel the same way you did last year aaron. I prefer the wing significantly more that's fine, it's just you're ridiculing the guy for disagreeing when i think it's not such a bad opinion |
|
|
|
Post by Haberino on Sept 17, 2011 22:31:07 GMT -5
isn't that what we do in bbs? overreact i can't disagree there |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Sept 17, 2011 22:43:37 GMT -5
isn't that what we do in bbs? overreact i can't disagree there Youre both idiots if you think this isnt not true. |
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Sept 17, 2011 22:51:52 GMT -5
After Wilt and Russell, what other center would you rather have? LaRusso has nice ratings, but Bellamy should be better than him. Havlicek was a great player, but lol much better? Fuck outta here. lol LaRusso has a jumper shot, Bellamy doesnt, advantage LaRusso...and its a big one |
|
|
|
Post by Haberino on Sept 17, 2011 23:06:57 GMT -5
Youre both idiots if you think this isnt not true. you think people dont overreact in BBS? |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Sept 17, 2011 23:13:50 GMT -5
I was hoping youd correct my double negative.
I was just bored.
|
|
