|
Post by Skillz on Aug 31, 2011 12:43:59 GMT -5
Rickey/Omar would be nuts though
|
|
|
Post by Play on Aug 31, 2011 12:45:49 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by repole ಠ_ಠ on Aug 31, 2011 12:46:14 GMT -5
Agreed on Bulls still being better, which is why I'm trying to swing Petit elsewhere to complete my lineup in a fashion that I think would give me a shot.
Lol at wasting Perry. He's a one year rental, and a backup at best at this point in my book.
Don't bother trying to talk down Stokes value, I've had tons of interest in him, he's pretty much my ideal type of center.
Also this is what happens when you post about someone not jumping at an offer that is AWFUL value wise.
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Aug 31, 2011 12:46:52 GMT -5
Habes doing his best Martinez impression
|
|
|
Post by Martinez on Aug 31, 2011 12:48:47 GMT -5
Habes doing his best Martinez impression haberman's a fucking idiot do not ever compare me to him
|
|
|
Post by Martinez on Aug 31, 2011 12:49:07 GMT -5
Agreed on Bulls still being better, which is why I'm trying to swing Petit elsewhere to complete my lineup in a fashion that I think would give me a shot. Lol at wasting Perry. He's a one year rental, and a backup at best at this point in my book. Don't bother trying to talk down Stokes value, I've had tons of interest in him, he's pretty much my ideal type of center. Also this is what happens when you post about someone not jumping at an offer that is AWFUL value wise. you're not evena top 5 team, in the league.
|
|
|
Post by greeme on Aug 31, 2011 12:51:25 GMT -5
Habes doing his best Martinez impression haberman's a fucking idiot do not ever compare me to him huh? isn't that what you just did?
|
|
|
Post by Haberino on Aug 31, 2011 13:03:57 GMT -5
Habes doing his best Martinez impression haberman's a fucking idiot do not ever compare me to him hahahahahahahaha
|
|
|
Post by Haberino on Aug 31, 2011 13:07:49 GMT -5
Agreed on Bulls still being better, which is why I'm trying to swing Petit elsewhere to complete my lineup in a fashion that I think would give me a shot. Lol at wasting Perry. He's a one year rental, and a backup at best at this point in my book. Don't bother trying to talk down Stokes value, I've had tons of interest in him, he's pretty much my ideal type of center. Also this is what happens when you post about someone not jumping at an offer that is AWFUL value wise. think it's more like what happens when i make a joke but do your thing. anyway, is there something about perry being a one year rental or backup that precludes him from being wasted? you have him for a reason, don't you? last week you said you got him to make a move to compete, and anyway, he's a far above average starter who will give at best one more year of his production and that's plenty of motivation to put your best foot forward while you have him. and i don't need to talk stokes down. i didn't question his value, and there's no doubt in my mind everything i said about him resonates with you.
|
|
|
Post by Haberino on Aug 31, 2011 13:08:41 GMT -5
Agreed on Bulls still being better, which is why I'm trying to swing Petit elsewhere to complete my lineup in a fashion that I think would give me a shot. Lol at wasting Perry. He's a one year rental, and a backup at best at this point in my book. Don't bother trying to talk down Stokes value, I've had tons of interest in him, he's pretty much my ideal type of center. Also this is what happens when you post about someone not jumping at an offer that is AWFUL value wise. you're not evena top 5 team, in the league. jesus dude can you at some point just google proper uses of commas
|
|
|
Post by repole ಠ_ಠ on Aug 31, 2011 13:13:05 GMT -5
and i don't need to talk stokes down. i didn't question his value, and there's no doubt in my mind everything i said about him resonates with you. Then you're wrong. I consider his rebounding and shot blocking to be enough to justify his contract. Else I would have never offered him said contract. He's 5th in the league in shot blocking and 9th in rebounding. He's basically Russell except he doesn't shoot so god damn much, which to me is a plus.
|
|
|
Post by Haberino on Aug 31, 2011 13:19:50 GMT -5
and i don't need to talk stokes down. i didn't question his value, and there's no doubt in my mind everything i said about him resonates with you. Then you're wrong. I consider his rebounding and shot blocking to be enough to justify his contract. Else I would have never offered him said contract. He's 5th in the league in shot blocking and 9th in rebounding. He's basically Russell except he doesn't shoot so god damn much, which to me is a plus. he's basically russell with a much worse turnover rate, fewer blocks and worse rebounding. 12 rebounds and 3+ blocks might justify 12 million (keep in mind dukes has marginally worse reb/sb rates, is much better offensively and is almost 8 mil cheaper), but his salary pretty much from next season on is going to be pretty ugly for such a bad offensive player. i'm not questioning the fact that stokes has value that isn't justified by his production, but it just isn't.
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Aug 31, 2011 13:21:21 GMT -5
comparing stokes to russell is pretty stupid
|
|
|
Post by greeme on Aug 31, 2011 13:21:42 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Martinez on Aug 31, 2011 13:56:22 GMT -5
you're not evena top 5 team, in the league. jesus dude can you at some point just google proper uses of commas You should worry more about why you can't get laid, faggot
|
|