|
Post by brophdog88 on Aug 15, 2011 13:01:04 GMT -5
and lol @ your best player is 31. yes, he is. not sure when 31 became 38, or a bad age at all. Dunno when John wall became my best player either
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Aug 15, 2011 13:02:06 GMT -5
Marty you're a contender but you should really look for a true 4 IMO. Just trade White for one---sure he has the value. and you think I should run with Woods at the 2? Running Woods at the 2 is better than Hill at the 4. Woods adds something to a team. If i saw hill at the 4 in a series i'd just play Ramsey there and he'd own him. (Ramsey's currently on my bench)
|
|
|
Post by Blue on Aug 15, 2011 13:02:31 GMT -5
whoever just smited me, fuck yourself
|
|
|
Post by Martinez on Aug 15, 2011 13:03:05 GMT -5
and you think I should run with Woods at the 2? Running Woods at the 2 is better than Hill at the 4. Woods adds something to a team. If i saw hill at the 4 in a series i'd just play Ramsey there and he'd own him. (Ramsey's currently on my bench) idk shawn hill's post D is pretty solid.. and he gets blocks... I have some tough games coming up(Wolves being one) if I do well in this next stretch I doubt I make a move
|
|
|
Post by repole ಠ_ಠ on Aug 15, 2011 13:03:51 GMT -5
Meh. Hill blocks shots and plays d, and though his rebounding is a bit weak, it's more than made up for by Baylor/White. I don't think I'd change a whole lot if I were Marty, since the O'Mara deal his team has performed as well as pretty much anyone's.
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Aug 15, 2011 13:04:02 GMT -5
But when he rebuilds he'll have a pretty easy time of it. On the other hand, you don't exactly have a lot of assets that are going to age well value wise. When someone takes over for you it's going to suck for them to get those picks back and do an actual rebuild. Kerr might be enough to get two of them back, but after that...eh. really skillz? that's your GM philosophy too? that if i can't get more than two of my own picks back, i should be worried? that last sentence says everything to me. whenever i want to rebuild, i know i can (and i don't take two seasons to do it). for now, i'm a top five team. you shouldn't be worried--yes we have the same philosophy. and there's no doubt you'll be able to get your picks back pretty easily. I just don't think you can criticize broph for the state his team is in when i think it is pretty clearly in a better position. Edit: unless of course you think your team is top 5 right now, which it isn't. If you really think your team is a contender then sure, you win. It's not though iMO--think it's delusional to think that your team is top 5. We'll see i guess i'll keep an open mind
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Aug 15, 2011 13:04:58 GMT -5
Meh. Hill blocks shots and plays d, and though his rebounding is a bit weak, it's more than made up for by Baylor/White. I don't think I'd change a whole lot if I were Marty, since the O'Mara deal his team has performed as well as pretty much anyone's. Hich is funny since you could say the same about my team
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Aug 15, 2011 13:05:40 GMT -5
Meh. Hill blocks shots and plays d, and though his rebounding is a bit weak, it's more than made up for by Baylor/White. I don't think I'd change a whole lot if I were Marty, since the O'Mara deal his team has performed as well as pretty much anyone's. Guess so. Just think having a really mediocre big starting on a contending team could be a big liability. I might consider Antonio for White. Want to see if Martin-Frank-Jordan can be enough offense in an outside offense though.
|
|
|
Post by Martinez on Aug 15, 2011 13:05:51 GMT -5
Meh. Hill blocks shots and plays d, and though his rebounding is a bit weak, it's more than made up for by Baylor/White. I don't think I'd change a whole lot if I were Marty, since the O'Mara deal his team has performed as well as pretty much anyone's. It's funny, I've actually played worse since acquiring O'Mara except he's been injured so much since I acquired him, but seriously for some odd reason I play better with him injured then in the line-up lol
|
|
|
Post by greeme on Aug 15, 2011 13:05:53 GMT -5
and OkC definitely is not a contender as it is. Need more. he isn't, he also thinks I'm not, which is a joke. Everyone Is underrating the nuggets
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Aug 15, 2011 13:05:57 GMT -5
But habes... It's not you rebuilding
|
|
|
Post by Martinez on Aug 15, 2011 13:06:39 GMT -5
Meh. Hill blocks shots and plays d, and though his rebounding is a bit weak, it's more than made up for by Baylor/White. I don't think I'd change a whole lot if I were Marty, since the O'Mara deal his team has performed as well as pretty much anyone's. Guess so. Just think having a really mediocre big starting on a contending team could be a big liability. I might consider Antonio for White. Want to see if Martin-Frank-Jordan can be enough offense in an outside offense though. I think im also 20 games over 500 and and have won 26 outta 32.
|
|
|
Post by Haberino on Aug 15, 2011 13:07:04 GMT -5
really skillz? that's your GM philosophy too? that if i can't get more than two of my own picks back, i should be worried? that last sentence says everything to me. whenever i want to rebuild, i know i can (and i don't take two seasons to do it). for now, i'm a top five team. you shouldn't be worried--yes we have the same philosophy. and there's no doubt you'll be able to get your picks back pretty easily. I just don't think you can criticize broph for the state his team is in when i think it is pretty clearly in a better position. Edit: unless of course you think your team is top 5 right now, which it isn't. If you really think your team is a contender then sure, you win. It's not though iMO--think it's delusional to think that your team is top 5. We'll see i guess i'll keep an open mind lol @ that third paragraph after what you said in the 2nd. you didn't even make an argument for broph's team being in better shape, you just kept acknowledging i had good pieces and then dismissing them for some reason. like i have nothing beyond jordan and francis, oh except the 20/10/3 and 18/11 bigs, but i'm not sure how much they fit. well, they're great and they're on my team, as are dukes and brown, so i'm in as good of shape for a rebuild and i'm clearly better now. so why's he in better shape? is juno suddenly a star? or is having a nice looking rookie the most important thing going, when he doesn't have his pick and his best player is about to retire?
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Aug 15, 2011 13:07:11 GMT -5
he isn't, he also thinks I'm not, which is a joke. Everyone Knows greeme gms the nuggets/quote]
|
|
|
Post by repole ಠ_ಠ on Aug 15, 2011 13:07:27 GMT -5
Meh. Hill blocks shots and plays d, and though his rebounding is a bit weak, it's more than made up for by Baylor/White. I don't think I'd change a whole lot if I were Marty, since the O'Mara deal his team has performed as well as pretty much anyone's. Guess so. Just think having a really mediocre big starting on a contending team could be a big liability. I might consider Antonio for White. Want to see if Martin-Frank-Jordan can be enough offense in an outside offense though. Hill fills a nice role for Marty though, his defense is more valuable than Woods coming in and taking a few extra shots away from White/Baylor/QD, especially when their offense is as good as it is. Sure, ideally Marty would have a Stokes type guy at PF, but he really doesn't need any scoring from that spot, and Hill's rebounding isn't hurting much either.
|
|