|
Post by Skillz on Jul 25, 2011 13:41:47 GMT -5
i think it is. i think dbw, broph and play have filled in for the old elite types. i like the league and its personalities now more than ever pretty much
|
|
|
Post by Haberino on Jul 25, 2011 13:42:31 GMT -5
great read though I obviously don't agree with all the rankings. Happy to be named 3rd but I think Insane should have that spot. insane is a horrible GM
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Jul 25, 2011 13:43:21 GMT -5
if you want to write that much, be my guest also there's no one in front of you to really make a case for IMO
|
|
|
Post by Juju Erving on Jul 25, 2011 13:44:26 GMT -5
deebs if youre on twitter i could set you up with some good dudes to follow. also just go fuck around on hoopdata or the advanced stuff on basketballreference and youll learn a lot. basketball prospectus also has a pretty good glossary. I don't have an account I should probably make one. But yea I'm on basketball reference a lot just looking at the advanced statistics of my favorite players and such. Plus there are a bunch of stat guys on realgm. I've been paying attention to them I definitely have the common ones down.. it's stuff like reb%, etc that I completely disregarded before but I'm peeping now
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Jul 25, 2011 13:44:56 GMT -5
Also if you compare the GM's right now to the one's in Mark article, the league is much stronger now
|
|
|
Post by Play on Jul 25, 2011 13:45:45 GMT -5
great read though I obviously don't agree with all the rankings. Happy to be named 3rd but I think Insane should have that spot. insane is a horrible GM shots fired
|
|
|
Post by Juju Erving on Jul 25, 2011 13:45:55 GMT -5
great read though I obviously don't agree with all the rankings. Happy to be named 3rd but I think Insane should have that spot. insane is a horrible GM lol I know you're joking but I feel like his success can't be argued with
|
|
|
Post by Haberino on Jul 25, 2011 13:46:36 GMT -5
most of the stuff is really easy to grasp, and just gives a much better feel for players looking at their regular stat lines. obviously not gonna learn much about their situation stuff, or rebs/d, but a lot of the efficiency stuff is right there for you to see
|
|
|
Post by Haberino on Jul 25, 2011 13:47:04 GMT -5
joking. <3 insane
|
|
|
Post by Martinez on Jul 25, 2011 13:49:12 GMT -5
if you want to write that much, be my guest also there's no one in front of you to really make a case for IMO um, you have Blue over me
|
|
|
Post by Martinez on Jul 25, 2011 13:49:44 GMT -5
and if youll bring up his previous track record in the last BBS, well I won a ship there too
|
|
|
Post by Martinez on Jul 25, 2011 13:50:16 GMT -5
also think Im better than greg
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Jul 25, 2011 13:50:25 GMT -5
Blue is a top 5 GM if he ever had time
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Jul 25, 2011 13:50:43 GMT -5
also think Im better than greg maybe. he's more consistent, you build better teams
|
|
|
Post by Martinez on Jul 25, 2011 13:51:02 GMT -5
Blue is a top 5 GM if he ever had time ridiculous excuse, Mark was a top 5 GM and he wasn't even putting in half the effort.
|
|