|
|
Post by Spencer on May 9, 2011 20:28:35 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on May 9, 2011 20:28:51 GMT -5
Because the draft notes are already up, this will be just a spot for discussion.
|
|
|
|
Post by DB on May 9, 2011 20:28:59 GMT -5
sick
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on May 9, 2011 20:30:08 GMT -5
Who goes #1?
|
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on May 9, 2011 20:33:41 GMT -5
nice
|
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on May 9, 2011 20:34:45 GMT -5
can you afford to pass on Rider?
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on May 9, 2011 20:35:41 GMT -5
I think Riders notes scared some away.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on May 9, 2011 20:35:55 GMT -5
I think Id rather have 3 or 4 then 1 in this draft.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on May 9, 2011 20:36:07 GMT -5
Which is odd.
|
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on May 9, 2011 20:37:24 GMT -5
meh, put him at SG, blocks, steals, rebounding, AC him and he is amazing, though the athlete deal is a bit worrisome
|
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on May 9, 2011 20:42:32 GMT -5
I like this draft a lot
|
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on May 9, 2011 20:43:20 GMT -5
1. Erving 2. Rider 3. Barker 4. Purnell 5. Carr is how i'd rank it
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on May 9, 2011 20:44:30 GMT -5
meh, put him at SG, blocks, steals, rebounding, AC him and he is amazing, though the athlete deal is a bit worrisome I think he could be sick at SG. |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on May 9, 2011 20:44:42 GMT -5
1. Erving 2. Rider 3. Barker 4. Purnell 5. Carr is how i'd rank it Interesting. |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on May 9, 2011 20:45:06 GMT -5
|
|
