|
|
Post by Spencer on Apr 11, 2011 20:53:12 GMT -5
Weird situation. Habes is acting like Marty now. you offering a freebie +3 is acknowledging i deserve the points for my work, so why not just give me what everyone has voted i deserve? Its acknowledging I want you to STFU. |
|
|
|
Post by Haberino on Apr 11, 2011 20:53:44 GMT -5
there's no rule that says a GM interview doesn't get the points voters say it gets. that's absurd. i did the work to get the +5 and the people have spoken. so why no +5?
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Apr 11, 2011 20:53:55 GMT -5
Actually, fuck it. Aar gets the article amount, Habes gets an RC. Thats what greeme and Maniac got. Im not gonna pacify you with freebie points. It is what it is.
No more interviews.
|
|
|
|
Post by Haberino on Apr 11, 2011 20:54:11 GMT -5
oh that'll keep me in BBS #lold
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Apr 11, 2011 20:54:14 GMT -5
there's no rule that says a GM interview doesn't get the points voters say it gets. that's absurd. i did the work to get the +5 and the people have spoken. so why no +5? PRECEDENT. Are you fucking dense? |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Apr 11, 2011 20:54:23 GMT -5
IDC. Done.
|
|
|
|
Post by Haberino on Apr 11, 2011 20:55:33 GMT -5
precedent is completely illogical and unfair, and you never once explained that that was the case with GM interviews. not like i'm alone on this. it's plain to everyone that there was no rule and i did the work that deserves a +5.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Apr 11, 2011 20:56:20 GMT -5
precedent is completely illogical and unfair, and you never once explained that that was the case with GM interviews. not like i'm alone on this. it's plain to everyone that there was no rule and i did the work that deserves a +5. The rule is what has already been done. If things go a certain way, thats an implied rule. |
|
|
|
Post by Haberino on Apr 11, 2011 20:56:54 GMT -5
but sure, everyone votes +5 and there's nothing posted on the forum that says a GM interview doesn't get you a +5, and i'm supposed to default to a precedent you a) didnt even remember (since you said you werent sure what you did with greeme/maniac) and b) everyone acknowledges is completely unfair to the dude who does 99% of the work
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Apr 11, 2011 20:56:59 GMT -5
How is precedent illogical and unfair? That is the worst argument Ive ever heard. Precedent is one of the most important things when making and following rules.
|
|
|
|
Post by Haberino on Apr 11, 2011 20:57:39 GMT -5
OK SPENCE
GOD BLESS YOU DOG
WE'VE HAD A LOT OF THE GOOD TIMES AND FAR FEWER OF THE BAD TIMES
NET POSITIVE IN MY HEART
<3 BBS
GOODNIGHT SWEET PRINCE. #GONE.
|
|
|
|
Post by Haberino on Apr 11, 2011 20:58:04 GMT -5
How is precedent illogical and unfair? That is the worst argument Ive ever heard. Precedent is one of the most important things when making and following rules. lolz im clearly saying the specific precedent youre following is illogical and unfair. |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Apr 11, 2011 20:58:05 GMT -5
but sure, everyone votes +5 and there's nothing posted on the forum that says a GM interview doesn't get you a +5, and i'm supposed to default to a precedent you a) didnt even remember (since you said you werent sure what you did with greeme/maniac) and b) everyone acknowledges is completely unfair to the dude who does 99% of the work Myself, before I wouldve done any amount of work wouldve thought.... HMmm, how many points did those guys get for interviews? I wonder. Because in all other cases the poster gets the poll results. So ya, I wonder what Id get in an interview scenario. LOL, thats what I wouldve done. |
|
|
|
Post by Haberino on Apr 11, 2011 20:58:45 GMT -5
i had no reason to assume i wasnt getting points for doing 99% of the work on an article that was getting 5s.
|
|
|
|
Post by Haberino on Apr 11, 2011 20:59:02 GMT -5
OK SPENCE GOD BLESS YOU DOG WE'VE HAD A LOT OF THE GOOD TIMES AND FAR FEWER OF THE BAD TIMES NET POSITIVE IN MY HEART <3 BBS GOODNIGHT SWEET PRINCE. #GONE. |
|
