James Worthy SF 21 6'9'' 225 B C+ C A- C+ A Billy Ray Bates SG 26 6'4'' 210 A- A C+ B- C- B Mike Sanders SG 22 6'6'' 210 B B C- A C A Keith Edmonson SG 22 6'5'' 195 B A- C C C- B Kelvin Ransey PG 24 6'1'' 170 C+ A- A- A- D+ B Allen Leavell PG 25 6'1'' 170 C+ B+ A- B+ D B
Yup. Good chance 6 is better then 1. Depends on how it falls, but ya.
When I say this mean simmage. Not that 1 guy is a bust or not a bust, just that they are close enough that one guy may sim really well, another one may not.
Yup. Good chance 6 is better then 1. Depends on how it falls, but ya.
When I say this mean simmage. Not that 1 guy is a bust or not a bust, just that they are close enough that one guy may sim really well, another one may not.
Out of curiosity do you feel you have an idea which players may fall into this? Not asking you to name names, but are you able to manipulate attributes so a well rated guy doesnt sim up to his ratings and vice-versa?
Will there be a good amount of C potential players that have actual good potential?
James Worthy SF 21 6'9'' 225 B C+ C A- C+ A Billy Ray Bates SG 26 6'4'' 210 A- A C+ B- C- B Mike Sanders SG 22 6'6'' 210 B B C- A C A Keith Edmonson SG 22 6'5'' 195 B A- C C C- B Kelvin Ransey PG 24 6'1'' 170 C+ A- A- A- D+ B Allen Leavell PG 25 6'1'' 170 C+ B+ A- B+ D B