|
Post by Haberino on Jun 19, 2011 14:39:32 GMT -5
idk, i just think its fair to assume these guys would at least be alright from three instead of giving them no ability (at least with the best SGs in this class)
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jun 19, 2011 14:42:11 GMT -5
idk, i just think its fair to assume these guys would at least be alright from three instead of giving them no ability (at least with the best SGs in this class) Meh. I think youre reading too much into 2 classes.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jun 19, 2011 14:42:27 GMT -5
And also preventing me from being more productive.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jun 19, 2011 14:42:38 GMT -5
Paul Arizin.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jun 19, 2011 14:43:31 GMT -5
I like more unusual draft ratings. I like the differing ages too. it makes it more difficult to rank players. I like that players with differing ratings can be productive if used correctly.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jun 19, 2011 14:45:25 GMT -5
Irv Bemoras SG 6'3'' 185 25 C B+ B+ C- D+ C
-Very good midrange shooter. -Extremely quick. -Very good passer. -Solid ball stealer. -Good 3 point shot. -Poor rebounder. -Poor man to man defender. -Below average rebounder.
|
|
|
Post by Haberino on Jun 19, 2011 14:46:11 GMT -5
idk, i just think its fair to assume these guys would at least be alright from three instead of giving them no ability (at least with the best SGs in this class) Meh. I think youre reading too much into 2 classes. well youre only way of proving me wrong is by making more three point shooters, so YEE!
|
|
|
Post by Haberino on Jun 19, 2011 14:46:27 GMT -5
irv bemoras is bad as names get
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jun 19, 2011 14:47:09 GMT -5
Dick O'Keefe SG 6'2'' 190 32 C+ C- B- B+ C C
-Extremely quick. -Good ball handler. -Decent inside scorer. -Solid defender. -Old. -Limited upside.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jun 19, 2011 14:48:05 GMT -5
Meh. I think youre reading too much into 2 classes. well youre only way of proving me wrong is by making more three point shooters, so YEE! Im not gonna fill the league with 3 point shooters. Id like to form some amount of need for certain things.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jun 19, 2011 14:51:39 GMT -5
Ernie Beck SG 6'4'' 190 24 C+ C+ B- C+ C- B
-Extremely quick. -Solid inside scorer. -Decent passer. -Solid athletically. -Decent 3 point shot.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jun 19, 2011 14:54:33 GMT -5
Billy Kenville SG 6'2'' 187 24 B- C+ C B- C- B
-Very athletic. -Good ball handler. -Should get some steals. -Solid man to man defender. -Mediocre rebounder. -Inconsistent 3 point shot.
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Jun 19, 2011 14:56:35 GMT -5
blegh, so shitty
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Jun 19, 2011 14:57:56 GMT -5
spence why not just adjust some of these guys to the existence of the three point shot? they didnt play when it was around, but its sort of dumb when it exists to just pretend they wouldnt be able to shoot 3s. thatd be fine if this were a league where all players were made in that vein, but if 90% of the guards can shoot threes, you make these retro guys a lot less valuable and the league a lot more uneven. i mean youre making otherwise very good players come in with c- and d+ outside. they wouldve learned to shoot the three, and the older players all shoot the three. I dont see how the value of retro players is less then pre retro players. older players=less valuable
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Jun 19, 2011 14:58:49 GMT -5
I like more unusual draft ratings. I like the differing ages too. it makes it more difficult to rank players. I like that players with differing ratings can be productive if used correctly. differing ages is a bit different, cause the draft is SUPPOSED to be where teams get young players to build around, if we wanted old guys we would use FA.
|
|