|
Post by Play on Jan 6, 2010 13:28:25 GMT -5
He is one of the best post passers of this generation. C handles? lol He is
|
|
|
Post by Jeff on Jan 6, 2010 13:30:05 GMT -5
I'd rather see him at B+ C+ C+ B A- C in his prime. That would be legit. C+ all in midrange and C+ handles all in passing and make him like a 3-3.5tpg guy.
|
|
|
Post by Play on Jan 6, 2010 13:30:13 GMT -5
I don't see how there low based on other ratings of other players. I like Webber but I don't want him to be a top 10 player. I don't want him to be A- B B A- A-. He wasn't that good especially considering how the league ratings are. I mean he isn't Charles Barkley good. Either he'll be a very good player, an All Star and All League Team candidate or hell be a solid starter. I guess his draft stock just dropped with this comment. Without the Injuries Webber would have been GREAT....He had some great seasons in Sacramento....Sucks that he couldn't bring your shitty ass Warriors to the promise land...You probably hold a grudge against him.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jan 6, 2010 13:42:23 GMT -5
I don't see how there low based on other ratings of other players. I like Webber but I don't want him to be a top 10 player. I don't want him to be A- B B A- A-. He wasn't that good especially considering how the league ratings are. I mean he isn't Charles Barkley good. Either he'll be a very good player, an All Star and All League Team candidate or hell be a solid starter. I guess his draft stock just dropped with this comment. Without the Injuries Webber would have been GREAT....He had some great seasons in Sacramento....Sucks that he couldn't bring your shitty ass Warriors to the promise land...You probably hold a grudge against him. But he wasn't. Lots of players couldve been great. With this scenario, if he does have 100 potential and with 3 RCs he could be one of the best players in the league. Not sure what more you'd expect out of a player who was a very good player in the NBA. Its lame. You guys cry about draft ratings, but when things get inflated you cry about that too. Fickle fucks, sit back and enjoy and STFU.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jan 6, 2010 13:43:50 GMT -5
I'd rather see him at B+ C+ C+ B A- C in his prime. That would be legit. C+ all in midrange and C+ handles all in passing and make him like a 3-3.5tpg guy. I said hed be A- C C B A- if he had 100 potential. He might get to C+ in handles, but if I start him at C+ then maybe he gets to B- or B which would be unrealistic.
|
|
manasrai
Senior Member
Ex-GM
Posts: 8,332
|
Post by manasrai on Jan 6, 2010 13:48:04 GMT -5
I always hated Webber. I say his ratings are too high. Make 'em lower Spencer
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jan 6, 2010 13:50:25 GMT -5
Webber is one of my favorite players. I have a signed basketball from when the Warriors drafted him.
|
|
manasrai
Senior Member
Ex-GM
Posts: 8,332
|
Post by manasrai on Jan 6, 2010 13:51:20 GMT -5
Webber is one of my favorite players. I have a signed basketball from when the Warriors drafted him. Hey Play, does this mean his draft stock just increased?? lol.
|
|
|
Post by Martinez on Jan 7, 2010 15:36:50 GMT -5
yes it does
|
|
|
Post by gmgreggor on Jan 9, 2010 11:14:52 GMT -5
Well, though he may not have been great he was quite a bit better than LJ in my opinion.
Webb could defend and rebound when he wanted too and had great hands.
|
|
|
Post by CC on Jan 10, 2010 23:18:28 GMT -5
damn it webber.
|
|
|
Post by CC on Jan 13, 2010 20:15:12 GMT -5
tank for this guy.
|
|
|
Post by CC on Jan 21, 2010 14:50:38 GMT -5
come to the bay.
|
|
Clutch
New Member
Indiana Pacers
Posts: 356
|
Post by Clutch on Jan 24, 2010 20:34:18 GMT -5
Webber's ratings do look a little low for him. He is worthy of a C+ defensive rating I think. He has a good inside rating however, and will really contribute to any teams' points in the paint.
|
|
Ducky
Full Member
Ex-GM
71% of the world is covered by water. The rest is covered by Cliff Harris.
Posts: 4,180
|
Post by Ducky on Jan 26, 2010 3:43:01 GMT -5
How does he feel about Denver?
|
|