|
|
Post by MeanJoe on Feb 9, 2012 0:57:57 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by repole ಠ_ಠ on Feb 9, 2012 1:11:44 GMT -5
damnitttt, was just doing this as well. Poop.
Good stuff though.
|
|
|
|
Post by Play on Feb 9, 2012 1:19:12 GMT -5
niceeeeeee
|
|
|
|
Post by repole ಠ_ಠ on Feb 9, 2012 1:28:26 GMT -5
I'll post some positional top 10s tomorrow hopefully. Have all the rankings done, gotta do a bunch of writing though  |
|
|
|
Post by brophdog88 on Feb 9, 2012 1:48:08 GMT -5
well damn Wille Norwood tops in turnover ratio, and Love and Johnson on there...sucks we suck still
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Feb 9, 2012 3:48:01 GMT -5
Love stuff like this.
|
|
|
|
Post by Haberino on Feb 9, 2012 4:02:48 GMT -5
5 in the top 82  |
|
|
|
Post by ukfanjohn on Feb 9, 2012 5:01:47 GMT -5
Stew Johnson !
|
|
|
|
Post by greeme on Feb 9, 2012 9:00:37 GMT -5
i would rather see per minute stuff
just adding another column shouldn't be t0o hard
|
|
|
|
Post by MeanJoe on Feb 9, 2012 10:15:44 GMT -5
i would rather see per minute stuff just adding another column shouldn't be t0o hard It would not be hard to do but it would need to add multiple columns & data. You would rather see an article with per 36 stats is that what your saying? |
|
|
|
Post by greeme on Feb 9, 2012 10:22:23 GMT -5
i would rather see per minute stuff just adding another column shouldn't be t0o hard It would not be hard to do but it would need to add multiple columns & data. You would rather see an article with per 36 stats is that what your saying? per min, per 36, per 40 doesn't matter. i think it just makes it easier to compare players that play varied amounts of minutes |
|
|
|
Post by DB on Feb 9, 2012 11:33:39 GMT -5
yeeee good stuff.
|
|
|
|
Post by DB on Feb 9, 2012 11:33:49 GMT -5
5 top 86
|
|
|
|
Post by jaycatch on Feb 9, 2012 12:50:45 GMT -5
Might use this for trade value
|
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Feb 9, 2012 12:54:37 GMT -5
1 in the top 1
|
|
